You guys act like downvoting was some sort of tyranny that prevented you from posting.
Downvotes did nothing, literally nothing. I havent seen a single poster here that can tell me what was actually wrong with downvotes.
You got downvoted, so what? Downvoting didnt delet your post. It didnt prevent you from posting in the future. There is literally nothing that downvotes ever did to a poster other than maybe hurt their feelings.
Can you give at least one reason why you are against it?
Again you make it sound like downvotes somehow prevent someone to post a well thought out response. That was never true. There was literally no downside to downvotes.
where have i ever said that i only use downvotes because me no think hard with brain.
hyp·o·crite
noun
noun: hypocrite; plural noun: hypocrites a person who indulges in hypocrisy.
synonyms: pretender, dissembler, deceiver, liar, pietist, sanctimonious person, plaster saint
What is an example of a hypocite?The definition of a hypocrite is a person who pretends to have certain beliefs, attitudes or feelings when they really do not. An example of a hypocrite is a person who says they care about the environment, but are constantly littering.
Here’s at least one person essentially saying downvotes enable their laziness. I don’t see a massive distinction between enabling laziness and preventing a post that would take more effort. It’s a crutch.
Still no answer. If he doesnt have the time to post, he also wont post if he cant downvote. So in what way did it benefit you that he couldnt downvote? Or the other way around, in what way does it hurt you if he can downvote you?
With what? My username? My avatar? My grammar? My spelling? I disagree isn’t much of a contribution either. " I disagree." Also happens to fall under twenty characters. Which you can’t do.
Depends? What are we talking about? Running countries? Filming movies? If I was Directing a movie and the cast started to vote on which scenes we should include I probably wouldn’t be too pleased about it.