Deflection. As always. You do notice when an icon on the desktop or start menu has been clicked, if it were a mouse issue it wouldn’t have registered and you’d see that. Isn’t the OS the programming we are talking about? That’s exactly it, the OS had a hiccup because 2 seconds later you were able to open it by doing the exact same thing as before.
No, its really not. Most matches you’re paired with players withing your same rank (all gold 5 for example). The 500 point decrease can definitely drop you down to Silver 1, even from midway through gold 5 (at up to 499 points). And yes, a person who’s ranked gold 5 would still ban if you were matched with them because now your rank is silver 1, not gold 5. If an unplaced person at gold 5 would ban, its because they haven’t “placed” but it doesn’t mean their MMR differs from their rank. It just means that season, they haven’t played their placement matches.
Well they haven’t proven otherwise. Anything could be said, doesn’t mean its true.
Just because you have nothing to gain, doesn’t mean you can’t lie. Lol
Of course its not going to be common… because its not programmed to be a common occurrence. Simple.
It is insignificant because there is such a small amount of times where this happened. That doesn’t represent the whole.
No. Anything that happens .01% of the time is not programmed to work that way.
Is it not logical to see what the devs say in their patch notes and argue against anything that does not align with how they programmed SL to work? You have two examples of when the rules broke and you’re claiming “it must be this way because these two examples (with probably a few more in the shadows unsaid… which still doesn’t amount to any significant amount) say it works this way” and you’re unable to differ from that viewpoint. Who is really the illogical one? The one who says it works the way it does because of an insignifcant figure, or the one who’s view align with the patch notes?
I’m literally not. If you can’t see that, its on you. Don’t blur the lines. I’m not saying the two posts that were linked saying that another player who wasn’t higher ranked banned in those matches were wrong or didn’t happen… I’m saying that people who are claiming its due to penalties are liars because they haven’t proven that’s the cause.
sigh… still sticking to that huh… okay. You literally said I’m not being illogical… yet still bring up how I’m calling others liars… when I’m not.
Except flat earthers have no evidence what they are saying is correct… like how you all don’t. Wouldn’t that make you the flat earther in this analogy?
My evidence is in the patch notes. If you can’t read it and understand it… that’s on you. Nowhere does it state that penalties don’t affect MMR other than changing rank… so unless you have evidence stating otherwise you have to go with what we know… which is that Rank=MMR.
I’m done replying to anyone else unless you solid proof what I’m saying isn’t true. If you can prove it, with evidence, then I’ll take back what I said because I’ll look at it and realize I was wrong. But I am not going to be sitting here getting called things while what you say has 0 merit because there’s not proof what you’re saying is correct.
I mean in reality, maybe not some bootleg forum, evidence is important… but I guess that doesn’t apply here does it? Or does it only when it benefits you? Idk. Go flap your gums, I couldn’t care less.
Btw Biochumikas, using an ad hominem fallacy isn’t exactly the best way to argue, especially when your ad hominem analogy intended to insult me isn’t even correct. Lol 