Oh like my favorite song:
More gibberish…keep it coming
Its not gibberish if it is text.
Overall this topic is about how lizard people are making you lose games. By the way, what happens if you cheese your winrate in AI games? Or does this theory apply only in ranked?
Matchmaker and competitive mode is garbage, and it is a fact. With or without twist, the developers do not even try. For five years, matchmaker is still not transparent, and the reporting system is still being abused. And this says a lot, for example, that they do not care about people and their game. And their “work” is just making money for daily needs and do not care about their creativity. People who love their work will never be so related to their offspring.
Lizard people is your tin foil hat talking. I refer to them as data scientists and engineers.
Lol…I dont play AI games at all.
So my tin foil hat is alive?
That is good, they are pretty boring and only good for farming quests.
Still does not answer my question. Though I do not play AI games either so I would not know as well.
Like i said more gibberish.
lol i saw that edit…u added in that u dont play AI games…lol u sure?
I don’t give a sheet about AI games.
I tend to edit my posts a lot actually. Though I edit it because I found it a bit rude.
That is nice, but I am still curious as to whether they count towards the theory. If not, does it only count in QP and Ranked?
Winning…20 chars
So if I win in AI games, will I than get a bunch of loses in QP games? Or if I lose in AI games, will I get wins in QP games?
If you consider AI is particularly part of the equation then I have some several question over why a mode with literally no rules that pressing and cancelling the button finds you a game regardless is considered part of it in the first place…
If your theory would be correct then i should also work the vice versa? queue up for 100 games with the same hero and win/lose 50% of the matches while tying to lose the game instead of winning it. I would not expect to win 50% of the matches i try to lose but the system should force wins on me?
Then you should also do the same experiment but you play a lot of different heroes and see if this makes a difference.
Making such experiments is a good way to prove your thesis.
Personally i think you don’t have the abilities to prove your theory because you lack analytical thinking skills and knowledge about scientific methods. I also think your theory is wrong and you have nothing to show.
My theory is that the OP is pretty unintelligent and has a hard time playing this game. It creates some frustration in this person because this person feels powerless. No matter how well/bad this person plays this game - this person feels like it has no impact on wining/loosing a match and therefore believes that the outcome of a match is under the control of someone/something else.
Maybe try to get some experience with other games. Play a 1v1 game for a while like Sc2 and figure out what’s the difference between a team game.
Also play some oldschool games that don’t have a matchmaking system where you just play against a random person.
Well it’s a novel forced 50%…it punishes more those people who once trick? Okay I guess. I would think a Sylvanas main would be punished much less than say, a Nova main considering Syl has good wave clear can build more for team fight or Macro, is just more flexible.
But okay, forced 50% for one tricks.
I am not sure myself, or maybe AI is not part of the equation?
I’m not sure how what the OP said supports the topic of the post.
I didn’t see evidence that it had anything to do with hero pick.
Ok, you get win streaks and lose streaks, but nowhere do you suggest how being a one-trick supposedly influences this…
It’s not a conspiracy. Blizzard admitted there’s a system in place that according to them is to “challenge you”, but we know it’s BS so we just call it the 50% rate or forced loses, because the outcome will be just that.
This is a fact mate, not sure on what earth you have been living on.
Don’t be silly. Anyone with enough time on this game can tell when you won or lost because the system, it’s super clear.
Please don’t you be silly…
It’s not silly. If you can predict games with above 50% accuracy its not silly. and you can predict in this game with >80% accuracy.
Also following the “no its random, you don’t know better” how is it random that my 11 last games i had 8 butcher on the other side, 3 with abby, and when i switch hero suddenly 0 butchers? this is NOT random.
It is really hard not to become convinced that MM actually tries to make you lose if you play well.
I had a few wins as a new Tracer. So the MM gives me:
My team: Tracer, Lucio, ETC, Tassadar, Mephisto
Their team: Lili, Cassia, Illidan, Varian, Blaze.
So, ugh. Yeah. Put 2 blinds, a tank with Protected and Taunt + Illidan with dodge versus me. And 2 tanks vs 1 as well. Just in case it seems like I can still kill something.
I know it’s just random BS. But it’s getting harder and harder to get convinced when I face a team that is full counter to me, while my team is already inherently weaker.
Still, we had a chance to win, but lost. I can’t help but feel that if the game didn’t just put that ridiculous setup vs me, we’d win.
It would be hard to believe indeed if it was a one time thing. But exactly because it is not. We start believing it.
Winrate going above 55% you bet I get losing streaks. because suddenly I lost all my ability to understand the game. And my teammates too apparently, because suddenly you get tough MM (for you if you play mainly one hero) and your teammates suddenly start dying like flies within the first 60 seconds. Snowball ahead DX