Warrior is only a perceived as a problem because of rogue

Multiplayer Discussion
41

Which is sorta the same thing as just saying

“It cant maintain a positive win rate against the two meta leaders”

Because if shaman could crush warrior, it would be at the top of the lists rather than…not.

Edit:

Which is to say both rogue and warrior are making shaman have a no good very bad day. Not just rogue.

1 Like
42

If Warrior isn’t an issue, how much removal and value should a deck have before it’s considered “too good”? Is there even a limit, since technically otk will still counter it?

43

I’m pretty sure control shaman, without rogue, could contest control warrior.

Control shaman isn’t worth running because it does worse against rogue — which is a bigger part of the meta.

And from my own personal experience, I win over 60% of my games against control warrior.

It’s not being pushed out by warrior, it is being pushed out by the #1 deck which makes it not worth playing.

Control shaman can keep a positive winrate against warrior, so I don’t agree with your statement.

44

Well…

Turn 45 draw matchups should not be allowed (even for meme decks).

But in general it is okay.

45

I dont see how. Especially if warrior suddenly faces a meta with more decks like it…it already has a very good value generator so absolutely any additional ones added should obliterate you.

Shaman spells do not equal warrior mechs in tempo or power. If they get to slam elys or nomis…

46

Yayyyy, blizzard listened to me! Im amazing!

hater shades on

1 Like