Summons 2 cost minions instead of 4 cost (despite the text on the card)
Velen is a direct multiplier, it doesnât have +spell damage anywhere on it⌠why would it affect Unexpected Results?
This isnât a bug.
1 Like
There is a display bug: Velen affects to the card text
OWNED, it IS a bug!
I have been using the mutliplyer forums for years.
With the new format of the forums it merges all forums when displaying the new topics, so I come here once in a whileâŚ
I have never seen anything like the bug forums!
Intternet police who think they work for Blizzard insulting people who come here with a legitimate CONCERN (didnât say legitimate bug)
And you trolls bully the crap out of these people.
If I were the mods Iâd ban people like you from this particular forum because you discourage people from trying to make the game better.
3 Likes
The same question: why it AFFECTS if it wouldnât?
This issue was supposedly fixed back in 12.2. Sounds like it was either unintentionally reverted, or never fixed to begin with.
1 Like
Blizzard, you can hire me to fix this issue! Iâm similar to Unity and C# ;>
@Magenta: In case you are serious and not just joking: https://careers.blizzard.com/en-us/
Iâm so serious, that I send my resume several times a month for 4 years 
https://github.com/HearthSim/hs-bugs/issues/1030
In case someone is wondering, heâs talking about the text being display as 4 cost minion when Velen is on the board, not the card summoning 2 cost minions with it.
No, this is not a bug. Velen doesnât have spell power, so itâs supposed to summon 2 cost minions. Yes, I do remember some patch note saying it was fixed to show correct text of 2 cost minion. Apparently it wasnât fixed or accidently reverted.
Wikipedia: " A software bug is an error, flaw, that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways."
Text on the card is incorrect. So it is a bug.
P.S. Bug is not about wrong mechanic behaviour only, but about wrong visualization too. About unexpected results. We unexpect that Velen affects to card text.
2 Likes
Yes, text is a bug, not the 2 cost summoning interaction, which your report was more intended towards. When someone says this as a bug, people wonât think of the text, but the interaction. Masked Contender for example, before the recent RoS patch in April 5th, the text said âplayâ despite what we all know of HS it is just not. This led some players reporting its interaction with Secretkeeper as a bug. It wasnât. Same as this case, it was just a text error, and it should be changed to âcastâ from âplayâ from the recent patch. As I and other said, this text display in Unexpected Results was supposed to be fixed. Iâm sure Blizz will sure to fix it (again) when they are aware of this.
So I donât see any reason to claim that it isnât a bug except to troll or seem smarter. I suppose we are here to improve player experience and report errors.
Thatâs why it could be more constructively if you write âYou are incorrect, card behaves as supposed to, but there is a text bugâ but not âItâs not a bugâ.
1 Like
For clarity of things, yes, it should be said it is not a bug, as summoning 2 cost minions is the intended interaction. No one said your report was useless, waste of space, nor was being hostile about it. On the contrary, your report was useful in letting Blizz aware this hasnât been fixed, or accidently reverted. Donât let one person lead you to believe there was any hostility here or an attempt to shut you out.
You act like a troll.
Letâs try again: the bug isnât in the card mechanic. The bug is in the card text. And it is still a bug (from the definition of a bug)
Come on, man. Youâre simply arguing over semantics here. Yes, if you want to be technical,
yes, it should be said like this. But as I mentioned, there was a similar case with Masked Contender. No, it is not a bug for Secretkeeper to get buffed by it despite it saying âplay a secretâ and it gets buffed when âsecret is playedâ. Obviously people will understand as text being the problem. If you want to get technical, you should also say, âyes, I was wrong about Velen + Unexpected Result having to summon 4 cost minion. So text is wrong and should be changedâ. Like, do you think people will not understand text is the problem when it summons 2 cost minions when it clearly said 4 cost minions in the text?
1 Like
Your first message said nothing about card text. It only claimed that 4-cost minions should have been summoned instead of 2-cost. The response to that was obviously that this is intended behaviour and not a bug.
After you first mentioned that the card text had changed to 4, all replies acknowledge that the card text is a bug (and the summoning is not).
1 Like
There is no different sub-channels in Bug Forum for text bugs. So I dont see any way to report this bug and not to face comments like yours âIts not a bugâ.
I see that some conceptions could be explained with already existing keywords (like in MtG). And Iâm still not a developer of HS and dont know is is a text bug of Unexpected Results or wrong implementation of Velenâs mechanic.
Long story short: it can be fixed in different ways.
I understand that. But as I said, or if I put it in a different word, there is hostility here only if you think there is hostility here. Donât take what some people here said as an attempt to demean you or belittle you. Some simply act less wordy, thatâs all. This is not a discussion forum, so some people simply choose to say what is what and end with conclusion, no attempt on socializing and whatnot.