hi mage is actually the best ranking deck and overall the best deck at top legend
why not tuning down it ?
the deck is going to step up in power soon enough with the new cards from expansion , you will see that this deck will reach high end level soon enough .stay tuned .
You’re factually incorrect. The best deck at top legend is Giant Druid, followed by Big Rogue, Enrage Warrior, and Frost DK. I absolutely don’t mean to be rude. Where’d you get your data?
this don’t mean that mage don’t need a nerf . warrior enrage don’t got all the answers like mage , ok enrage can kill mage but mage is best deck overall across all classes the winrate of a skilled player with mage is very high and the possibility for mage to don’t have a lot of bad mach ups make it top tier for ranking even at high legend of play .
Where do you guys get this information? Do you make it up? At no relevant rank is mage near the best deck. Please, note that I’m not trying to be rude.
At least Rainbow Mage is fun, and requires an expanded knowledge of decks in the meta / as well as playing smart, AKA good decision making.
I think there’s an argument that it’s best for top 1000 Legend. It’s not one that I actually subscribe to myself, but if I went full intellectual dishonesty and made a case for it I feel like I could be rather persuasive. Therefore, I’d at least consider it “near best” at top Legend.
But only at top Legend. And I imagine that there’s another argument that I don’t actually subscribe to myself, that top Legend isn’t a “relevant rank,” so there’s that too.
Point is, I think it’s just barely close enough. Tier 1.5, if you will.
Extreme agreement. The deck rewards skill. I think we need to stop nerfing decks that reward skill.
A serviceable analogy, but not the best one. We are dealing with empirical measurements here, not mathematical constants. Therefore, may I suggest: might as well just say I don’t think the population of California is greater than the population of Texas.
Nah, I’ve learned on these forums you can’t do deep analogies. You have to keep it stupidly simple. You should know by now these forums can’t handle deep analysis.