You cannot think a sample size of less than 2000 games is accurate right? Also, this site shows everything with insane win rates.
1 Like
This gives me Hope you’re Just misguided, so, again, from the top:
When looking at deck effectiveness, we look at the highest ranks. That’s the ranking at which Blizzard looks and furthermore, that’s the deck player at it’s best. At lower ranks, players sub-in cards and missplay more, and play more inconsistent, varied homebrew. The data then, is inconsistent.
The only person in this thread using metadata info is you. It’s unreliable, as seeing it’s putting decks at 80% winrate, and It’s NOT directly interchangeable with other websites. That’s what we call picking your data. You have backup for your claims, right, but it’s bad, unreliable backup. Flipping between the data sets os also not helping your point.
1 Like
I posted not once, but twice, a print from the legend page from HSreplay from the day. At legend, exactly for that reason.
Then, i explained why legend only.
1 Like
Oh it’s been proven to you multiple times from multiple sources, so far I’ve seen none from yo.
So yes I’d say the sample size is more accurate than you and the other mage players here, by far. If you disagree you need proof, get it
Then I really can’t make this more clear to you, as I have already done multiple times, that you not anybody else crying fake news still have no proof that mage winrate in plat-legend is anything other than busted
If you don’t understand that then that’s your issue but it’ll be made clear that those are the facts
You could. You could Just have posted Mage winrate at plat - legend, but you printed at Gold to try to prove a point no-one is making.
Seriously, Go up the thread. When did i mention Mage winrate ar plat-legend?
Btw, you do know plat is still low ranks, right? Accurate winrate data is mostly looked at as: Top legend/legend/dia 5-legend/the rest
1 Like
I did, and you came back with one site showing bronze-gold info - that’s you selecting data to back your claim
I’ve given you multiple sites with the same info, if you don’t want to listen to metadata than that’s you, it really doesn’t shock me as you’ve tried everything to avoid anything proving you wrong. You can call it unreliable but it’s a better source of info than you and that’s that, hsreplay backs it up
Again, you have zero evidence backing anything you’ve claimed - I have plenty. There’s no discussion to be had there
You tried using info from bronze-gold and now plat isn’t enough for you? It seems you’re only looking at the evidence you want to? Can you post a multi-source portfolio to cite this as I have done above please as so far every piece of data is going against you and you just don’t want to hear it which I’m finding tiresome
First: the data at metadata is unreliable.
Second, i’m not the source of my claims. You keep insisting that to try and discredit me, bit it’s a bad lie.
Third, even with your data, there’s a 20% difference between the sites, they are not backing each other up.
Which site i mentioned with gold-plat info?
Oh please, winrate information or not it’s really severely getting off topic and derailing the thread into random hsreplay winrates. Winrates is a odd tool and publicly available data is often plenty to spot a good deck that will often easily be able to pilot by a good player to a diamond 5 rank to get the most efforts for the least minimal exerted effort vs fighting for slivers. I mean it’s great stuff, and legend data is viable.
But i think with a deck like quest mage, making the entire meta warp around it, after you’ve already done legend a couple times and got the cardback and first time rewards all it is a kinda long and arduous journey for like a extra single 100 gold pack a month that probably ate 2000 dust on the deck to get.
Literally right here
Idgaf if you don’t want to listen to meta stats, all sources show mage with an absurd winrate. Whether there’s a 20% difference or not they’re both over performing
Again it needs to be said loud and clear. Every source of evidence shows you are wrong, you don’t get to disagree with that - you’re nobody
Seriously, change your name to deadhead.
Youre vision doesn’t match reality.
Its been shown numerous times.
Jeebus, I thought I was bad.
Well trolled.
Any data to back this up or nah?
More than you have to back up yours.
Oh ok, because I’ve accurately cited every stat I’ve posted and you haven’t shown any evidence so that seems to be the opposite of what you just said
49% win rate deck from d4-1 as of right now…
1 Like
The interesting thing about that data, is that mage has to win around 120% of its non mirror matches to hit 80% win rate.
Your data sucks 
You’re welcome to think that but since your data doesn’t exist the facts remain, you need evidence to state otherwise
Again, it’s important to highlight that no source supports this claim
Basic maths and your data