Bomb warrior is not an uncommon deck, and there are hundreds of thousands of games played every single day.
How many times has your impression led you astray, when it comes to matchups and win rates? How are you making the judgement that it is not that likely you will win? Are you looking at global data or just how it feels?
I’m not sure I fully understand what you intend here.
If you mean something nefarious, I am not sure.
If you mean the system is more sophisticated than the information we have, I agree.
They have given us general criteria of how it works, but not any specifics. In particular we know nothing about the mechanics of how the match making system attempts to influence win rates.
Something along these lines, yes. I think it’s likely that they withhold information about matching because disillusioned players would latch onto one item and declare the whole system rigged.
If the game is waiting for the counter to queue up, then for the counter deck that player gets a free win. So it is weird. If it is what you are saying then the game let someone win by gave him an easy opponent. OR the game do this every time so it is always 50% win. So you only win (more progress) when you having more cards. You know how you can obtain cards. So if you buy more cards with money you lose more games. The game see that you spend money to get better. And let you lose to even spend more money. So I ruined my own game pleasure by buying packs a few times.
I left the game. But when I just started the game I had fun. I had nice loot from packs. Later I bought welcomes pack and Arianne bundel. My rng got worse both packs and opponents and now I don’t play anymore.
You do realize rank doesn’t matter, right? You get ex legend players in bronze. Do you think these guys are worse than current legend players? No, they just don’t grind anymore. HS is 90% of the time played on auto pilot. You barely get to make any original decision, due to the pace of the game. It’s like the first 10 moves in chess.
I’m playing a fairly unpopular spell mage (only spells with tons of card generation). I am heavily favored against face DH and face hunter, yet I rarely play against them, which is “not wierd at all”, when they are the two most played decks in the game. Waiting for 5 minutes for a game in plat, only to get matched against value warlock is insanity.
If that were true, your rank should not be consistent. Pro and consistent legend players would not exist. Such a statement is demonstrably absurd.
Go google any third party data aggregation site like vicious syndicate, and show me where aggregate data shows ANY mage deck being favored against face hunter lol. I can’t post links but I already checked — I analyze available information to make reasonable opinions.
So no, it is not a favored matchup. You may simply be outplaying your opponents, but that does not make it a favored matchup. Are you recording your performance with a deck tracker add on? Probably not I assume or you would have more knowledge of matchups.
I don’t even know what kind of deck that could be since no reasonable deck like that exists in enough popularity to track, but the premise you are being cheated here is completely false.
Your mage deck is most likely not favored against the decks you claim are being hidden from you (source, thousands of games 
) so I would not be so sure of myself if I were you and stick with the more reasonable assumption that blizzard is not personally out to get you given the premise of your claim is not likely correct in the first place.
fingrknitter… please stop being reasonable and informed. It’s getting old. 
It is, I get dimond constatly for the past few months, just from grinding quests for the tavern passes, which are a complete scam, but that’s another topic. I don’t push for higher, because I don’t like ranked, but from time to time I find a cool deck, like the spell only mage, that interests me.
Anything else you said is just complete repetition of your past posts, so no point in addressing it. You are wrong about which matches I’m favored against, as you don’t know the deck in the first place, since very few are playing it, or the variatons of it overall.
OTK mages counter is anyone with cards so I doubt any rigging was needed.
I don’t play OTK mage…
What the huh???
Are youo deliberetly taking quotes out of context? Yes, yes you are. No point in talking wiht you.
Are you deliberately being disingenuous?
You literally said you were playing otk mage, then denied it…
No, I don’t. He oversimplifies the matter with “OTK mage doesn’t beat anything”. He has no idea which OTK mage I was playing, as people here believe themselves so good, that they know all decks, regardless that there are 3 different versions of it, all strong and weak against different decks and second he knows, or should know full well, I don’t play OTK currently.
Taking quotes out of context lulz. Well ok then if you dont wanna talk then ignore is a good place for you. Also git gud because all mage decks right now lose to hunter. Just goto VS and look at the matchups. Hunter is a huge favorite vs spell mage. But ok if you want to live in your own reality where spell mage beats hunter, you never played otk mage, and the game is rigged vs you then good luck when actual reality hits you in the face and you are pulled out of your fantasyland.
And this is why you are not worth discusing the matter with you. You are ignorant.
Ok that was funny 
.
Spell mages worst matchup is literally face hunter and you switched to it hoping to go against face hunter and you call me ignorant. Ive made legend 4 times now and had 9500 BG rating. Im not that bad at game or ignorant. I got better at game. I dint blame matchmaking for my losses. And now its time to ignore you.
You keep refering to spell mage as “mana cyclone spell mage”, which I DO NOT PLAY!
What do you typically play?
Spell only mage, OTK mage and big mage, but that’s only in wild now. Before that I used to play exodia mage, freeze giant mage and freeze mage, when I was playing in local turnies. Unlike p2w players I barely get the dust each season to create 1 deck. This is my whole point, the system insentivises having multiple decks, thus paying for the game, by deliberetly matching you agaist counters.
When I was playing in local tournaments, in 2013 in beta and 2014, (I have card back to prove it), that wasn’t the case at all.