A 0 cost refresh hero power to burn someone for 30+ damage is just a complete unfair advantage if you are not a healing class. PLEASE fix the card and put it back the way it was during the nerf. That was fair. It doesn’t matter that it’s in wild. It’s just broken.
2 Likes
It’s the way it should be. Wild is supposed to be wild.
That’s not really the reason. The main reason is: until now I’ve not encountered a single raza user. Ok, I did encounter 1 and that’s all.
So that’s the main reason why raza need not be nerfed.
I think they are trying to force players in to standard by making wild so horrible to play that everyone leaves.
2 Likes
Lol not really sustainable.
Coz
In the Long run all your cash / gold paid cards turn into wild or classic cards, so it’s not going to be sustainable for players to stay in standard only, coz then they’ll have to always buy and dust after 2 years, buy and dust after 2 years.
1 Like
I’m not going to comment on the proposal itself. I don’t think I play enough Wild to comment.
But I will say that if Blizzard, after changing Raza, then reverting the change, will now follow this proposal and change him a third time, then I’ll start a petition to get the card renamed.
Raza the Changed
3 Likes
Raza decks got some flavour. Wild is actually in such a good spot right now because all of the best decks are interesting to play. I should have some mad hate for Raza because it is an absolute counter to my budget secret mage but my next deck will have Raza in mind because I think he’s there to stay at least for a while.
In a meta, where almost everyone can cheat out big stuff, u think Raza is op? KEK.
If Priest is viable, that means it’s OP.
2 Likes