Zilliax is so good he’s played in 50% of decks.
That’s a good way of guaranteeing it gets nerfed.
5 Likes
I love all the assumptions you just made, not really a good argument if you have to assume ![:confused:](https://dacy5cilkxabf.cloudfront.net/en/hearthstone/images/emoji/twitter/confused.png?v=6" ":confused:")
I don’t understand how you can argue against the fact that it’s played in 50% of decks in standard. When it’s not in half of my standard games I’ll stop complaining.
I didn’t assume anything about you. Your post is telling me all I need to know about your mentality. Even if Zilliax was nerfed you would just move on to the next card you lose to or are “tired of”. That seems to be the current trendy excuse people use to call for nerfs these days.
I don’t. I just don’t care because I don’t see it as a problem. Why wouldn’t a NEUTRAL very FLEXIBLE card be popular? Give me 100%, 90% or even 80%, and then even I could say there’s a problem.
Well, shoot. I guess you’ll be complaining here for a very VERY long time then.
Oh no! imagine having to trade with your aggro deck! Thats just terrible. How am I supposed to win if i can’t go face?? Maybe if you actually removed the mechs on board the magnetic effect wouldn’t be as strong.
2 Likes
Found the rogue players.
Notice how they said they didn’t assume then proceeds to assume again 
Just because you don’t see it as a problem doesn’t mean others don’t
Finishes with another assumption 
1 Like
Is Zilliax maybe a tad too good? Sure, I’d concede that but it is also one of the few strong Taunts left in the game so I’d rather leave it where it is.
I use it one deck (Muckmorpher Shaman) and not in another (Control Shaman). It is certainly a strong utility card for multiple archetypes but, at least to me, the card never feels unfair.
Basically, Zilliax is a rotational all around solid card. Azure Drake was killed for being classic in a similar position. Since Zilliax rotates I doubt it gets touched for usage since it isn’t overpowering
1 Like
Do you even play aggro? If you do then you would know that this is not accurate as they cant constantly get rid of all minions every turn.
why you start a new thread when there was already a thread?
“No one listen to that thread because the guy didn’t explain how Zilliax is overpowered right, so I am going to start a new forum and do the exact same thing, people will listen to me then.”
1 Like
The message needs to be pushed that Zilliax is OP. It’s clearly a problem if this many people are liking this thread even if there was already one, it just helps prove my point really.
Your OP has 1 like unless my cell is messing up so obviously I’d say more of your responses are against than for you from reading.
2 Likes
I hope the devs buff Zilliax, just to increase the amount of saltiness people complaining would experience:
“The only and last card to ever receive a true buff: 5 mana 3/3, Divine Shield, Untargetable (not even battlecries), Taunt, Rush, Charge, Lifesteal, Windfury, Magnetic”.
Concede to perfection.
Since you’re dead set on not listening to us, how about Blizzard’s response? It’s basically what we’ve been saying to you.
Playrate alone is not enough to make a card nerf-worthy.
5 Likes
Do you even play hearthstone? Sometimes you need to know when to trade and when to go face. You don’t need to kill every minion just the mechs. If you don’t want to kill the mechs then you need to deal with zilliax on turn 5.
1 Like
Zilliax is not OP though. Anyone who has a decent sense of hearthstone would know that Zilliax is a strong card, but no where close to being OP.
No one is liking your thread, no one liked the last guy’s thread. Are you reading the comments?
3 Likes
Pffft hah! The delusion is strong in this one. Bet you’re happy downvoting is not a thing on these forums.
Sorry to break this to you but you’re part of the minority. 
Okay, I’m just gonna craft it and join the rest of the 50% of players who play it. Screw it lets make giggling inventor 5 mana again since we’re not doing anything about the most played card (by a fair amount).
Absolutely not!
Firefly and Tar Creeper were in an absurd amount of decks, should we nerfed those too when they were in standard?
Firefly was in 25% and that was absurd because there were so many 1 drops to compete with. Zilliax is in 50% because there aren’t as many good 5 drops that compete with him.
Zilliax is strong. Pretty strong. But nowhere near busted. Have you tried silence, OP? Because I do not think you have tried silence.
Edit:
Huh? You have zero idea what you’re talking about. WE WOULD BE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE MOST PLAYED CARD IF IT WAS A PROBLEM. You’re completely alone here, you’re literally just wrong.
1 Like
So if the majority said giggling inventor should be 5 mana again I’m guessing you’d be on their side too then?