Totally OP. Why all their cards cost 1-2-3 mana crystals with taunt cards with 5-8 health.
Just nerf some of their OP cards.
1 Like
Try using a better deck.
2 Likes
There is no better deck in the wild mode.
There are some decks that at best can be considered as having the same power, some counter decks (but they have almost no chances against many other decks) and everything else that try to dodge Discard Warlocks and pray for high rolls (for themselves) and low rolls (for Warlocks) when facing Discard Warlock.
3 Likes
Is disco lock too strong in Wild because of the latest set or miniset?
Because if so, then I am not opposed to revision.
However;
if it is too strong because of legacy cards, then…
Welcome to Wild.
1 Like
What’s the cutoff for legacy cards? It’s most likely cards across many expansions.
1 Like
Well, first determine if the deck is too good (ie: wins way too much)
And then, if the deck is over-performing because of cards from
the last full release, or the latest miniset, then those cards might be looked at for revision.
If it performs the way it does from cards older than that, well that’s the way wild is.
If you start nerfing legacy cards, then pretty soon you have a mess bigger than standard is.
I play against disco lock all the time, and while I think it is strong, I don’t see it as any more sickening than alot of decks.
The problem is that the cards from different expansions weren’t intended to be used together. People are always going to find crazy interactions.
1 Like
exactly. which is the whole point of wild.
if there was something crazy going on from the newest cards then maybe I see a case, otherwise, oh well.
1 Like
I think they need to open up matchmaking for each expansion on its own, even if players can cross-match expansions.
It’s an interesting idea:)
1 Like
How would that even work?
If I choose to only play X-expansion, yet I can face decks from Y-expansion (cross-matched) then it makes no difference.
If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting what is known as an oxymoron. You cant say I ONLY want to face decks from this era, while still facing decks from a different era (when necessary). It just doesnt work that way!
The difference is that the decks wouldn’t contain cards from other sets, which is what makes Wild, and Standard to an extent, seem unfair.
I only suggest facing other expansions because the queue times would be long otherwise, and it might be interesting.
Find a new game. No one wants to play with cards from a single set!
the Classic format has proven that! It was just a haven for bots!
Lol, okay, because I want to play Hearthstone in a certain way, but you deem that no one wants it, I will find a completely new game, and learn new cards, and new rules. So wise.
Hey, you made the claim. I just refuted it.
Do you work for the company? Just curious.
No, I am merely the CEO of Microsoft!
2 Likes
Oh okay, understandable then.
1 Like
Sure is. Its just as understandable as your inability to play the game well.
Why are you so rude? Shouldn’t you be fixing the Windows bugs?
1 Like