Can somone unnerf mystery egg already ? It wouldn’t be a good card in standart and mystery egg was a part of a fun and viable deck in wild. If any game devs are reading, please consider it
Which easter egg are you refering to exactly?
Im refering to a card, mystery egg, not a mystery easter egg
My bad, I just came across an easter egg card back an opponent had and it messed me up.
I hated that deck. Endless zero mana beasts in the early turns was oppressive. I hope it gets nerfed again just for existing.
3 Likes
Absolutely not. That deck was the definition of a degenerate deck. Flood the board with zero cost beasts. There was a reason for the nerf. When a deck is too broken in wild that’s saying something.
1 Like
But it actually wasnt broken, and if you wanna see broken decks look at draka rougue that can win turn 3 or 4 consistently or hostage mage that makes games last hours sometimes, or maybe even any druid deck thats apm and wins turn 5 or 6, the mystery egg hunter wouldnt stand a chance against any of them
2 Likes
If it wasn’t broken it wouldn’t have been nerfed.
It was nerfed because of standard, it was viable at the time there, and now its obselete, the point still stands, it wouldnt be good now
If unnerfed version wouldnt be good still.
Why are you trying to revert the changes?
It was a previously oppressive card that held most of the wild meta at its mercy while it was around.
1 Like
Because it was fun to play, i am not saying it would be completely unplayable, probably high tier 3 at most, but the deck ist that degenrate anyway, look at hostage mage for example, stalls for 20 turns and then kills you with infinite damage or iceblocks, wild is all about degeneracy, eg. Seedlock
I thought we were talking about egg hunter?
And how it gains permanent control of the board by turn 4 consistently thanx to all the synergy build into hunters beast and deathrattle packages…
And to address your deflection.
1 Like
It wasnt a deflection btw, it was a reinforcment of my argument, there are already tons of degenrate decks in wild that are oppresive in their own regard, that was the point, and if you actually played that deck, you would know that it wasnt that good against aggro (board centric decks) becuase they would most of the time be able to go under
That it summons endless rush beasts? That it takes and maintained board control for the one or two turns it needed to close the game?
That it ran over control, combo and aggro?
The observer sees more than the player.
Maybe you were bad at playing it and by the time you figured out how to pilot the netdeck they nerfed it.
Thats where my moneys at.
1 Like
But it didnt run over any archetype in particular, it was good against control, a 50/50 against aggro, and ok into combo, I played thousnds of games with the deck and I had like 51 - 52 percente winrate, and if you look at any meta breakdown at the time you would be able to see that people put it at low tier 2 or high tier 3
That says it all.
Im done here.
That is not an argument btw, if you want to concede your position thats fine, but understand that the decks wasnt that good at the time and wouldnt be good now, especially with current wild meta
Im not going to agrue with someone incapable of even recognizing their own shortcomings.
Sorry to ruin your fun.
Could you point out my shortcomings then ? Cause instead of giving me arguments that are based on merit you just concede and call my unaceppting
1 Like