You have no idea you need to go to more (even 1 is enouth)parent teacher conferences.
The types of things i hear on those meetings if anything are way worse than you can ever imaging.
You should try to never lie to your kids even worse when that lie it will affect their everyday life interactions.
I had a very happy childhood and i thank the heavens everyday for the family i have, those that truely love you will always want you to be the best version of yourself you can achieve.
They laided the values and foundations im now trying to pass to the next generation and i still count with their help to do so.
You do realize that the concept of perfection is subjective, right? There’s nothing wrong if a parent thinks their kid’s perfect and tells them so. Google ‘perfect definition.’
It looks to me like you’re basing generalizations on the small sample size that is the parents that attend the parent-teacher conferences you do. The people in your area don’t necessarily reflect on people elsewhere.
Edit: @Orion, I didn’t mean to rag on your childhood nor am I trying to argue with you in a negative way.
I was brought up in a very loving family. In my mind a parent would certainly think their child’s perfect. Not everyone does, apparently, and I can’t argue with that. For me, it’s very strange. And by this I don’t mean that a parent doesn’t realize a child’s faults nor areas that need improvement. And that parent most definitely should strive to improve their child, whether it be at school or if they need to learn how to listen, what have you.
I mean, I think we agree on a lot. Back to the topic, I don’t think it’s asinine to have places lower than first. I don’t play Battlegrounds, so cannot really comment on that. However, again, look at competitions like the Olympics. There’s bronze, silver and gold.
@Orion, do you believe there should only be first place in competitions? That anyone (or team) that isn’t first place shouldn’t be recognized and even rewarded? If I am misunderstanding your position, I apologize.
wtf? Im legendary player have 80% winrate and enemy deck pool depending to my deck isnt conspiracy it is experience…
but someone with a win rate of under 50% can’t recognize that - you will simply never see such a matchmaking when the game tries to reduce the high winrate to 50%
So you have an 80% winrate and belive the game is rigged, to get a 50% winrate? What kind of logic is that? Or do you believe that your deck is so strong, that you should have an 80% winrate?
Let’s assume for the moment that he is at 80% AND constantly faces counters, but is able to maintain that 80% still. Many posts, including this one with the video, point to money and greed for reason why they would rig MM.
If Front242 is able to stay at 80%, clearly their method isn’t reliable. So if money is so important that they would rig the game in the first place, why would they only rig MM?
Why not rig the games themselves. Opening hand, mulligans, card draws, RNG and everything else…for both players of course, no reason to take and chances. If they can maintain an algorithm that takes into account every card in your deck, this shouldn’t be a problem. Your at 80% though, so this clearly isn’t the case either, unless you’re just an exception.
How do you explain being at 80% then? If they wanted everyone around 50%, we would be.
What are you dont understand? I see rigged because your deck determine enemy deck pool and that’s it… and enemy deck pool is limited to COUNTER deck only if your winrate is >50%
This is my experience of how the game works…
But if you can explain? Why when I have a really strong deck, my opponents only have 2-4 counter deck and they keep repeating themselves and when I change my deck to RND cards I immediately meet other decks which are very different, because the game doesn’t know my deck!
Jajajaj it does not. Not sure how you can read that out of it, if you are able to read it.
He says he only gets counter decks and he is at Legendary rank, he sure knows the pools of decks there are. So his assumption is correct, out of the pool of decks he encounter usually is changed, if win rate passes 50%.
if he actually has “80% winrate!” it may actually indicate why his thought process is so warped:
an extremely low amount of games (the ONLY way to have 80% in legend, even legend #1 cannot maintain that winrate) means that it’s actually possible that he has seen a significant amount of deck A and B instead of deck C and D (assuming decks A,B, C, D are the popular meta decks).
Now, the fact that deck A and B are his counters, with such a TINY sample size, is statistically entirely possible.
You don’t need such statistic, don’t use fancy words at such case. Pretty much anyone can get winning streak and loosing streak. So you are at 80% win rate at some point, inside pool of 10-20 games. And! statistically you should not get any losses, if pool of decks that are currently playing, is still the same. So you should continue to win endlessy if other players don’t swap their decks and still win against others they battle, but you can only be stopped if game starts to give you counter decks in row! Which is based on your winnings!
What I read out of it, that you are unable to read what is described here. And use statistic in odd manner.
I make it simple for you!
If there is 100 decks in the pool, and 80% win rate guy got lucky and his deck beats 85 of them. Others don’t swap their decks to counter him, because they also win others. While loosers in that pool, are switching to counter some other decks and not the 80% win rate one. So, he should continue to win endlessy and have low chance to loose against 15 decks. If he has grinded a lot, he sure knows the usual deck pool. And swapping decks should not trow in big change. Both which happens.
And yes, the solution is always at plain sight. Easy way and fool proof way, for them to find you equal opponent, is to trow deck that mostly wins against yours. Simple as that. Opponents chosen by decks strenght - rigged.
Why in your example do decks only have a single counter?
“Others” means how many decks? I mean, 50 people just lost, but your saying none of the decks they switched to should beat the 80% deck?
Sure he shouldn’t face those 15 decks very often, but are saying he should never lose a good matchup?
You have people switching decks after every loss, but they are only cycling between a small deck pool? Also, unless he is repeatedly playing against the same exact players, out of the thousands of players available, the “usual deck pool” means nothing.
He faced 4 counters in a row, but deck 5 wasn’t also one of those 4 counters, so this equates to rigging because he switched decks?
How did he ever get to 80% in the first place when he faces counter after passing 50%?
Why are we limiting it to 10-20 games exactly? I have won 12 in a row before, where were my counters on match 11 and 12?
