I would dismiss this as ‘paranoia’, to put it colloquially, but after reading the post above by the same author, I’m beginning to see your point. I’ll still be cautious with conclusions — I’d prefer to draw them based on solid facts, — but there is room for assumptions here.
I wish instead of such ‘spokespersons or promoters’ — regardless of who they are and their intentions — we would actually have proper communication on known issues, which, alas, doesn’t always happen, as the linked example indicates.
PS
Any proof of that? If that were the case, that would be new.