Well that is impossible since there aren’t enough 10 mana cards to do that.
What do you mean, there are over 70?
Looking at the website there are 37 x 10 cost neutrals, so you can do this. Were you meaning that you would you get a mirror if you do it?
1 Like
“if you dont believe what say because i say so you are ignorant”
thats the argument antivaxxers use! and they arent exactly the brightest minds out there
2 Likes
Ignorant is believing in your crazy without question.
That’s not logic. That’s demonization.
This is how people believe ridiculous conspiracy theory nonsense like Trump being a Kremlin puppet or the Clintons assassinating anyone who crosses them. The entire point of demonization is that you dehumanize your target to such an extent that the idea that they would go 2 inches further never seems wrong, because they are a one-dimensional extreme, only wanting to be more evil.
If you allow yourself to think this way, you’ve already given yourself over to darkness. Demonization justifies grave injustices against other people. It enables an innocent until proven guilty mindset. It enables the justification of the death penalty. It enables the belief that certain races or genders are subhuman. There’s no such thing as the justifiable demonization of other people.
Here’s how I think about Blizzard: I think that they are lazy in the sense that they’d rather have a big long drunken (slightly misogynistic) party all day, than work on game development. But at the same time, they still want to keep making money. I’m not romanticizing Blizzard as being exemplars of ethics, but I do at least see them in two dimensions, with interests that compete against each other. Everyone has interests that compete against each other. And I see them as having interests even I have sometimes: I try not to be lazy but I am sometimes, and I also like money. Literally no one out there is one-dimensionally just trying to be as evil as possible, because evil believes that it’s good.
And players accuse me of derailing threads.
Some players here should invest in better mirrors.
Complaining about derails is normally just throwing a little hissy fit because people aren’t talking the way that the complainer fantasized about. Control freak freak out.
My dude, did you ever heard of hyperbole? Warrior didn’t always had FWA in hand.
But more importantly, have you ever heard of math? Do you have any idea how important is a mulligan? God, if you hard mulligan for a card, you will get it about 50% of the time at least by turn 2.
It’s like, one of the most important parts of the game. Educate yourself.
Wallet Warrior dies and turns to dust without FWA in the opening hand.
Wallet Warrior makes trash5 a lot of money.
Thats what a detective would call a motive dummy.
That means the “detective” is now HONOR BOUND to dig a lil deeper and like others who have a clue…
There is no way in the nine hells did TRASH5 pass up the opportunity to rob people.
Ben Brode dipped before his name could be attatched to this scam.
Its a scam.
Mate, before it being a plot, you have to know if it’s not just plain chance, LMAO.
Which it is. You not understanding how mulligan works isn’t tell of a crime. I bet you also find it strange when Paladin always has a turn 1 play, or any deck starts with the “perfect turn 1 play” for that matter.
Just so you know, with two copies of the card in a deck, the chances of finding a single one by turn 2, going first, is 45%. Going second is even higher. If you have 6 cards of a mana cost (let’s say, 1), the chance of finding at least one per mulligan is about 75%.
That is to say, decks finding cards they put in them isn’t a conspiracy. It’s by design
2 Likes
Yes, and when streamer gets new lego from new set, and its in his opening hand 10 games in a row… and goes on a 20 game win streak on stream…
Because he keeps drawing this 2 mana, boost all cards in you deck 1/1 lego.
I think thats super lucky…
I wonder why they keep saying we the players should expect to “win/lose around 50% of your games”
hmm thats weird…
I do hard mull for vandarr… I dont ever get him on t4 like almost ever…
I do however see guff5 in almost every single druid match…
That sure is weird isnt it.
Game is so rigged. It always matches you against Worthy Opponent without fail.
1 Like
But did this happen? In which stream?
Because if you’re put against someone equally skilled, you should win about 50% of the time
Vandarr is just a singe legendary mate, the chances of finding it by mulligan is far lower. BTW, i don’t believe your almost ever. Go track your games and bring out some actual numbers.
Druid draws a metric ton of cards; specifically, druid when it was running guff spent the first 4 turns discovering cards from it’s own deck to find guff. And turn 5 is far later than mulligan. Do your decks with vandar draw as much as druid?
BTW, i don’t trust this either. I played against a ton of druids without guff in T5
The only weird thing here is how you jumped 17 steps straight to conspiracy before contemplating the obvious possibilities a single step ahead
1 Like
Well, even to produce random results, the RNGs have to follow a certain algorithm. Hence, the RNGs can never actually be truly random.
You’re kidding right?
Yer a weird dude leave me alone.
Now that’s just uncalled for. Scrotie is at best autistic
Challenge declined.
The average winrate will always be 50%. No matter what happens, every game has two players and the matchup winrates add up to exactly 100%. Maybe it’s a perfectly fair 50-50, maybe it’s 70-30, and if the outcome is completely rigged it’s 100-0, but the two numbers always add to 100%. 100% divided by two players is 50%.
The only way to have an average winrate other than 50% is to introduce players who aren’t “players.” For example, human players could have an average winrate over 50% if bots have a winrate below 50%. It’s zero sum, meaning in order to be above 50% you need to take it from someone who will then be below 50%.
Ya know damn well this is only true in the game overall, but individual players may have more or less winrate, and that that is his point.
It’s not a “why is 50% of the games won”, it’s a “why should a player in particular have 50% winrate” and that the answer is that they are in their skill bracket at the moment.
1 Like
lol… I face legend players everyday.
Whether at bronze5 on my f2p.
gold 5 on my f2p
Or where i am atm plat10 on my paid acc…
I played an hour long match against DOG in silver whatever week or 2 ago…
I have lost, well over 1000k games in the last 2 months,
Playing 15 hours a day or whatever messing with cards making decks etc.
I make horrendous missplays… at times etc…
I havent played in 3 xpacs…
Yet Im dead on t4 blizzbot pirate rogue…
Guff5 every druid.
And it never ends.
Whatever the theme of a deck is, thats how it plays out against me.
Its not BS confirmation BS…
Im seeing the same thing in every game…,
I dont get lucky and run into aggro decks when I got a good deck to face them nope.
I get mulled over and over by druid.
Change decks, opponents change.
I have seen value decks that have ZERO chance of climbing against the current meta… but time and time again there it is because its power point happens before mine everytime.
Its not a bias… I see what I see…