Is control warrior ever going to be addressed/reworked?

honestly its become such a toxic deck thats unbelievably unfun to play against, whether its brann warrior, odyn warrior, hamm warrior, whatever, all of it is boring, barely interactive, and makes me want to stop playing

im all for control decks being playable, but when the deck is basically just taking wincons out of your deck with no reasonable counterplay, i cant help but wonder what the devs were cooking

its just a horrible feeling and a miserable play pattern, rework boomboss, nerf brann again, rework hamm, whatever
i dont think balance even matters for control warrior, I mean statistically its not even that good rn, its just such a terrible deck to play against, and i pretty much always end up closing the game after playing against it

i would rather play against paladin aggro and have the game over in 5 minutes than to sit through a 25+ minute slog of a game :confused:

3 Likes

I do agree that playing against any warrior is mind numbing. My issue with them is the insane amount of aoe removal they have.

You honestly just can’t build a board consistently enough to even last one turn. Thankfully this expansion and last didnt bring any aoe to warrior, so rotation should help a tad with control warriors toxic play pattern.

2 Likes

Hearthstone is never going to change. It’s going to be broken decks and broken cards for all time.

It never gets balanced. The devs don’t care. Never have, never will.

Every new expansion introduces some broken thing that every wallet warrior will pay for. Then get infinite wins. This is all by design.

1 Like

yep they need to adress how bad it is

maybe by unnerfing odyn!

but the deck is pretty reasonably balanced and falls apart against faster deck, the issue is it just isnt fun to play against

fr, you can build a board turn after turn and they will have a way to deal with it without fail
(I mean seriously, 3 brawls in a “highlander” deck is absurd lol)

I just saw someone playing a mage kill a warrior, by making 3 Sifs and killing them at 30 health and 24 armor. Play that mage.

LMAOOOOOOOO thats insane dude

It’s not going to be addressed because it’s not an issue.

It’s a bottom feeder deck. It’s complete trash in this meta.

Does it suck to play against if you are a much slower deck? Sure. But that’s like all the deck beats. And that’s why it won’t get addressed. It’s not a power outlier in any way.

It’s just a deck that beats up really slow decks and really bad custom made decks.

yeah i know, I mean i did say i know it isn’t strong in the meta anything like that, it’s just incredibly toxic and frustrating and I don’t like to see that kind of card design be done over and over, because it’ll only get worse i fear

Never leave the house the world is full of scary stuff and things you dont like…
By all means vent your frustration just dont expect the meta to bend to your likes/dislikes.

I think the root issue regarding this thread, is you phrased the title as a question that implies balancing concerns but in reality it’s just a vent thread. It’s fine to vent, but I don’t think people would necessarily go so extra against your salt if they were EXPECTING salt going into it.

So then you get people being like “this deck sucks bro, y nurf” and that just tilts you because your POV is “I don’t care, it’s not fun to see” etc.

You are kidding, right? Players here act like you slapped their gf if you criticize anything at all, lol.

i mean sure but i think its fair to say cards like hamm and boomboss are simply bad design and are not healthy for the game

2 Likes

Not sure about Hamm, I mean it’s annoying if it eats your win con, but it happens, it’s just another version of a dirty rat

But Boomboss is definitely toxic and broken

Luckily for us, the meta doesn’t allow that card to be played often nowadays xD

yeah! but also i think w hamm its the concept of it

i mean not even yugioh goes as far as to just take cards out of ur oponnents deck

:sweat_smile: :joy: :rofl:

Cards from your deck are worth less than those in hand, depending on their position inside the deck

Dirty rat can do the same to you, while getting a 2 mana 2/6 taunt at the same time, early game it can be devastating

We need those disruption to surprise-punish greedy decks with only one win-con

Those decks are very rare nowadays

EDIT: Damn, a wild Warrior appeared xD I’m gonna maybe have to rethink my words

Hearthstone… Hearthstone never changes…

There are several decks that do this now. Rogue, Priest, and I guess, Warrior too.
I don’t like them myself.
What exactly are we learning? That thievery is superior to winning on your own merit?

The HATE for control warrior is astounding. Odyn is a very well designed card that allows a control deck to work toward a REAL win condition and not just drag the game out to fatigue for 20 more turns. Players have already said that they despise 90 minute games of HS and i cannot disagree with them. I love a good control deck but i hate games that go to fatigue. Give the deck a REAL win condition. Lets also keep in mind control warrior is barely a blip on the radar of this meta outside of some fringe play at high legend.

The really sad part is the contempt for Boomboss. The card is dead weight against Aggro, Combo/OTK and even Tempo. That’s why it has no play in the current meta. It has one purpose and one purpose alone. It’s the ultimate trump card to a control match mirror. Control mirrors dragging on is just bad and will drive new players away not draw them in.

I didn’t realize control warrior was still playable…