How is this possible? Hack?

Community Discussion
1

I just played a mage.

Almost every card they played was a morphing card. How is this possible when you are only allowed two? If no one has an explanation then it must have been a hack correct?

2

Incorrect. Your opponent was playing a Whizbang deck. The Mage Whizbang deck only contains those morph cards.

https://hearthstone.wiki.gg/wiki/Splendiferous_Whizbang#Mage-0
1 Like
3

Okay, I didn’t know that. AI copilot told me there were only two cards in the deck called morphing cards. Thanks.

4

That era where people stop using their brain and blindly trust AI hallucinations
All you needed was to type “Hearthstone morphing card” on google, open the first link to the wiki and you would have instantly seen it was a Whizbang card, redirecting you to the whizbang decks
THIS should be your first reflex, before asking an AI that can get things wrong on so many levels

3 Likes
5

I did use Bing to search for the morphing card after using the AI. I don’t use google because it’s to curated with ads on first page of results, and hides stuff they don’t want you to see.
Now I cleary saw it part of the whizbang deck. So I assumed the deck is like all these other expansion with different cards and with TWO morphing cards. I looked and thought it was deck that came out years ago or something. I really don’t follow the expansions.

6

You chose 

. poorly

7

ai curates results as well


gemini will push google apps and so on, the same way google search push some results


1 Like
8

Bing is probalby the best search engine out there. Not enough people use it for microsoft to bother with curating things and hiding stories and images. Google will hide and block negative stories about certain things and certain political parities.

People also hire hacker teams to change search results for google to hide stuff. Epstein did this. The files that were released exposed he did this.
No one bothers to spend the time and effort to do it for bing. So you get all the results.

1 Like
9

You don’t understand how results are done then.

Censoring and curating are not the same thing. Curating is the way you order your results, censoring is hiding results.

You have also different algorithm for the “relevance”, which means the results themselves, but apart from that, you also choose which one is pushed first.

It’s relevant economically (you search “computer price”, should you show amazon first or a smaller company selling computer?), it’s relevant politically (you search “trump”, should you show wikipedia? a left journal? a right journal?), it’s relevant culturally (you search “good food”, should you show french cuisine? indian cuisine? american junk food?)

If you think the same is not done for IA, or for every search engine, you surely don’t understand what they are and how they work.

10

Curating includes the act of selecting the results
By curating you choose what you will present, and by doing so you chose what you won’t
You then organize the results

Curating is starting from nothing and adding things up
Censoring is starting from something already existing and removing or hiding parts of it

A search engine is not censoring a website for not including it in its results

12

For some reasons my post got tagged, so I’ll remove anything that can be seen as controversial and hope it’s fine now.

Relevance algorithm is a bit different than curation algorithm, but whatever your definition is, they are different things, regardless of if you count relevance inside curation or not.

As for non included results being censored or not, it depends if it was shown in the relevance algorithm or not. Then there is the question on whether the censored element is shown as censored or not, like for DMCA things.

Regardless, we pretty much agrees on everything there, curating = presenting results = ordering results (and thus show what will be first). This can’t be objective regardless, as “relevance” is a subjective matter.

So yeah, every search engine, being ai or not will be biased on the ordering. This bias can be political, ideological, or financial. Usually all at the same time. Google will promote google products, american search engines will usually promotes american companies/ideas, etc.

Not doing any judgement, as it’s impossible to be fully objective on that matter, and it is logical to promote your own ideas/interests.

All I’m saying is people should be aware of it, instead of thinking “Not enough people use it for microsoft to bother with curating things and hiding stories and images.”

Yes bing curates differently than google, but it curates regardless, and people should understand that.

13

simple answer: Blizzard is a criminal corporation, as evidenced by the ongoing investigations into all sorts of issues over the years. What is Hearthstone? The product of a criminal corporation that will sooner or later close offices, lay off workers, and perhaps even dismantle every single game (much to my delight, I might add).

1 Like
14

to a question nobody asked
The thread is about a whizbang deck OP didn’t see
The side-topic about currating is regarding AIs the OP used before creating the topic
Please read before replying something completely off-topic