Are you sure? They just killed one of the most fun decks ever. How many fun decks do the fun police want to kill?
[quote=“Scr0tieMcB-1291, post:22, topic:137415”]
Not that I want it deleted, but Wild could be deleted tomorrow and the backlash would be survivable.[/quote]
Ok, so you don’t like Wild but the thread is about a problem we have in wild.
1 Like
Retry just got tired of your cretinism for underestimating and insulting the wild community, maybe you hate not being the host of the forum on these topics, idk whats your problem, but be thankful they only remove your post, i would have banned you for a few days…
As many as are necessary, I like Holy Wrath but if this continues along the same line of not allowing abominations like the unguru mage, I accept and understand it, the idea is that the game is fun for everyone, not for just one class…
1 Like
I’m not insulting the Wild community. I’m just saying Wild isn’t THAT important. The title of this thread is arrogant. If that offends you, that’s on you.
If you think they’re removing that then you’re delusional
Two easy changes to the cards.
- make holy wrath no longer holy type.
- make holy wrath target random enemy.
Wouldn’t nuke the combo still playable. It just wouldn’t be a instant win now.
Bored seeing the same deck played multiple in a row the last couple matches
the best way to get the card nerfed is to play the deck
the reason bsm got nerfed was too many people playing it
so, they more people insta winning, the quicker its nerfed
2 Likes
4 out of 5 games in diamond ive lost insta to this dumb mechanic. Its not even a contest.
1 Like
Im not just referring to this post, but to everyone you go to and i always find you curiously, not exactly throwing flowers at the wild players…
They can ban it when they re-ban the Seed Warlock which is just as stupid with barely any counter play to it.
They should also make every freakin cards in the game always cost at least 1 mana no matter what.
Players drawing their entire deck and playing zillion cards in a turn should not even be possible.
2 Likes
Player don’t breakdown into 3 strict catagory’s. a lot of standard players use wild for quests etc. people sometimes play more bg’s and sometime less.
1 Like
You are really being pedantic about the word ‘need’ aren’t you? Let’s consider that video games are not a necessity shall we? Few people on planet Earth probably relatively speaking play video games and they don’t really matter. Hearthstone could be deleted tomorrow and most people wouldn’t care. Hell, the INTERNET could be deleted and society would survive presumably.
2 Likes
I disagree that video games aren’t a neccessity. I believe they are, or else they wouldn’t have been invented nor consumed as much as they have been.
2 Likes
One could make the same argument regarding alcohol, Altair.
Might be for the best, even.
1 Like
But to answer your point more seriously, I don’t consider it pedantic so much as a point of decorum. People ABUSE the word “need” too much.
Just cap max damage to 10 on holy wrath and it works exactly like it did before this card came out. Problem solved.
Blizzard will fix it by making Expanse cost 101.
1 Like
I don’t queue up for a “game” in wild to be matched up with these “non-games”.
I just queued, got a Paladin so I won’t be playing tonight … those people can play each other.
And I would agree
Just because it also does a lot of bad, doesn’t mean we don’t need it for the good reasons that we do from time to time
And I don’t mean it for drinking, although I would argue there are cases where that’s beneficial, too
For example, there’s this genetic tremor which can only be “turned off” by alcohol xD I know a guy who literally has to drink to keep his hands steady (and he’s far from delirius tremens or any serious alcoholism)
That argument is universally valid for me, I think. At least I haven’t yet found an exception
1 Like
Addictions are not necessities. Much like Scroties addiction to posting on these forums despite not currently even playing the game, addicts will do what they do. What they are addicted to is not, by default, a necessity.
You being addicted to gaming doesnt make gaming a need anymore than me being a smoker makes tobacco a necessity.
4 Likes
I tried quitting smoking once, and I had terrible physical and mental sympthoms:
Physical:
- constipation
- sweating
- trembling
- plus all the other physical manifestations of mental symphtoms
Mental:
- brain fog
- lack of concentration
- suicidal thoughts.
Now, I NEVER EVER have brain fog and suicidal thoughts. And I’ve done and quit a lot of other drugs in my life.
Some people just can’t quit smoking (50% of them) and some can quit without feeling any of the above (25%), some quit with some of the sympthoms and the sympthoms get better the more times they try to stop (remaining 25%).
I’m not here to debate about the true meaning of the word “need”, but I suspect I know much more about that topic than anyone here, simply because medicine and psychology are my hobbies (and have been for decades now), and I do think we “need” more things than some cynics here will acknowledge.
Yes, we do need video games. And some of us need that tobacco. And some of the others need their shot of alcohol.
2 Likes
Again, addictions are not a need. They are an issue,sure, but your DONT NEED them
I am sorry for your addictions, but you dont need them.
Thats exactly the discussion YOU started, so yes, you are here to discuss it.
2 Likes