3 rafaam warlock in a row at diamond 3, i bet it has nothing to do with me playing control warrior, all luck ofc, 30% winrate deck with 0.001% play rate
1 Like
Isn’t control warrior supposed to win against rafaam since warrior is more likely to have time warp before warlock plays all 10 rafaams without one being tampered with ?
2 Likes
i won all 3, thats not the point
So why do you say
if that’s not the point ?
1 Like
my point is since the game matches you based on what cards you put in your deck rather than skill playing off meta niche decks with low overall winrate seems to give you easier opponents, i just went 90% winrate from D5 to legend again with a garbage Tier F ramp druid ended in top 1000, 860 to be exact
see you all next month lol
you yourself said you won as control warrior, a deck that is not niche, against a rafaam warlock, a deck that is niche against which you were favored. Isn’t that a direct counter example ?
1 Like
you have no clue and thats okay, dirty rat panda dirty rat or copy the Haam and eat 2 cards pretty much guarantee you win the matchup as warrior
love how idiots like you when someone talks about rigging they cant comprehend it goes both ways and the game gives you free wins too
Umm.. can’t you see the greater problem in what you said?
I have claimed this before and the regulars swore the players are picked out of a hat randomly and the algo does not look at your cards.
I have played since this came out, and I have genius level IQ and recognize patterns.
One thing I noticed early on was if you put cards in your deck to defeat certain decks, you won’t get matched against them anymore.
The regulars told me I was full of it and it’s random.
Most of my games were against plague death knights, so I put two steam cleaners and two geists in my deck.
I ran this deck for 5 months about and never got matched with a plague death knight or asteroids.
I took them out, and suddenly I got asteroids and plagues again immediately.
The regulars summed it up as random aberrations. A penny can flip heads a million times in a row, they said.
You are literally making no sense. Get some sleep and come back to the forums.
Please find some other venue than the forums for managing your emotional reactions to happenstance.
That’s the problem. Even for researching a simple coin toss you’d need a sample size of at least 20 or 40. And since this game is also massively skewed in results: you need at least 60 or 80 sample matches before you even begin being confident about patterns.
Well since you’re talking about coin tossing, allow me to remind that even for something as simple as a 50/50 you still have a chance to end up on oddities
If you toss 1000 coins, you are very likely to hit at some point a chain of 10 times the same result, as demonstrated here : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGYAejN6fePSVGp2-_kWNSHWLd-GtAWz2qxwBAzZogE/edit?usp=sharing (refreshing the page makes a new simulation)
If a group of 20 person each toss 50 coins, then one of them is likely to find that long streak and think that something isn’t right, because that’s a 1/512 event, even though it’s perfectly normal to find it in such context
1 Like
Exactly. And my point was that in this case it’s even more probable to hit misleading extremities, because the situation has much more skewness than a simple coin toss.
For example: you may draw the perfect Legendary card 3 times in a row which is way more impactful that hitting heads 3 times and that can happen in many variations.
You generally need a good sample size for the problem. Judging by D0nkey’s stats: win rates don’t stabilize before ~80 matches (not card stats (those need more)).
1 Like