I don’t see where the player experience option is, didn’t even know this is was an available filter. What would I see tho? Do tell, cause I don’t know where to look
The left side filter below rank range. Players have to have at least a minimum of 50 games played. It’s labeled player experience.
I am not seeing what you are seeing, my left side filter only has a few options available. How would this filter change anything tho, who can be in diamond rank with less than 50 games played and why would this bias the metric anyway? Is the deck becoming worse the more you know how to play it?
If it’s S tier…why does hsreplay don’t mention it as tier 1, but tier 2?
1 Like
Because you see a difference in winrates based on the play of the decks (consistency) within the meta, which show you information with regards to how new everything is and what’s really powerful.
Within hsreplay, under Player Experience > 50 games played, on the left side of the screen where all the other filters are.
It is sitting as the top deck in all ranks according to HSReplay (all regions, since FoL started)
Actually it isn’t based on consistency, demon hunter is. Demon hunter is sitting at 68.1%.
Hsreplay says it’s tier 2, which is not bad, but still no tier 1 and so no s tier.
I think Chapuzo is intentionally not using the filter I told him about.
Okey I see where you were looking now. You are looking at individual deck winrates tho, I was looking at meta rankings aggregating deck archetypes. Individual decks with 200 games might show a disproportionate WR compared to decks with over a 1000 games. I don’t think this is a correct measurement. You need to compare how similar archetypes are performing overall, not how a certain deck without Sylvanas played 200 times compares to the other decks. I always go for the meta tab to check the general state of things. The decks tab I use to search for lists to try.
edit:
This is honestly not something I would ever do. I genuinely just wasn’t following
It shows the win rates based on play which show that demon hunter has the highest, not blood dk, of minimum 50 games which is a lot of games at the start of an expansion. Consistency shows that blood dk is not the strongest, although it is strong, deck.
The expansion was released on Tuesday, this is accurate information.
But you are looking at data from individual lists. I was discussing the performance of archetypes in general. The list that sits at the top is a DH list with 250 games played and this is why it has a crazy 68.1% WR. It is an artifact due to low sample size. It is better to go to the meta tab to compare how compounded archetypes are performing, regardless of 1 or 2 cards that might differ from one deck to another.
I am not VS tho, so I bet we will have the most compelling data when the VS report comes out and settles this for us.
And those are the decks that are used within the meta, and based on 50 games, minimum the deck that’s the highest win rate, is demon hunter. You can see for yourself. 50 games isn’t a small sample size if the game was released on Tuesday.
You’re not taking into account, the consistency of play with the decks. And are ignoring the minimum 50 games played aspect.