Congratulations! Hearthstone has officially "upgraded" to a battle pass system!

They already made a post about how bad the battle pass is on, couple of streamers made a video about it.

2 Likes

Yes, which is why the new system isnā€™t defensible.

That wasnā€™t the question that was asked of me.

Math isnā€™t opinion. There is always a right answer.

If I say 2+2=4 and you say itā€™s my opinion, there is no more discussion or sourcing that will ever matter.

I did already. Iā€™ll repeat it, since you didnā€™t read it the first time:

you did not proof anything and nobody was disagreeing with you until you pretended the triplicate protection is new

2+2 is not 4 because you say it is

2 Likes

Funny, how you want to use the word autism so are you making fun of Dan Aykroyd, Tim Burton, Albert Einstein and Newton? Btw I am on the spectrum too.

www newscientist com/article/dn3676-einstein-and-newton-showed-signs-of-autism/

Correct! Thatā€™s what makes it not an opinion.

Nor is the reduction in packs required to get full completion due to triplicate protection.

2+2=4 is not just your opinion because i have a reliable source that can verify it

you being a self proclaimed math prodigee does not proof anything

triplicate protection has been heere since the start of the year several people have already told you this

1 Like

i am not making fun of autism im just pointing out his logic

2 Likes

What does being on the spectrum have anything to do with someone asinine logic?

not being able to see things in perspective maybe

cause it would be a waste of time

1 Like

yeah but at least i know math!!!

Yes, it is true about how autism see things differently, but to use the term autism because he doesnā€™t agree with you is not only speechless it is also just plain unapologetic use of a word.

it was not intended that way im sorry

just didnt want to waste my time

maybe you can explain to him that nobdy here was disagreeing with him

Ok Iā€™d like to understand.
The general idea is that people are saving 8000 gold per expansion. Thatā€™s 50 per day (quest) x 7 days, x 17 weeks, for 5950. Lets round to 6000.
Then the 2000 comes from 3-win plays. Thatā€™s 2000 / 10 = 200, x3 = 600 wins. At 50% winrate thatā€™s 1200 games. 1200 games x 20 minutes (INCLUDE any and all downtime to reach an average of 20 min per game) / 60 = 400 hours / 17 weeks = ~24 hours per week / 7 = 3.xx , letā€™s say 3.5 hours per day. Remember 400 hours per expansion IN CONSTRUCTED ONLY**. ** and I guess battlegrounds top 4 counts as a win? Include BG then, but Iā€™m not sure if an average BG win takes 20 min.

Now itā€™s been established that the XP value of the QUESTS ALONE will get you level 50, albeit at week 17.

SO when you factor in 400 hours you already supposedly do into the rewards, its 400h x 400xp = 160,000xp past level 50, / 4500 (per level beyond 50) = 35 additional levels = 5,300 gold

Either my math is way off, or youā€™re complaining for nothing.

who me?
im complainting when people know it all but refuse to provide any evidence
thats all

I will give my example, and I represent probably the majority of players, what you might call an average player.
I play the game for a few hours a day, in those few hours, I can acquire with my daily quest min 100 gold. 100g x 30 days is 3k gold. 3k x 3 months is 9k gold. My CASUAL PLAY = 9K gold I can spend on anything I like, and I donā€™t have to grind 6 hours for BP level. Math is very simple for me. I donā€™t want to play.

1 Like

the math is wrong cause you dont get gold for 3 wins

and this was about evidence for opening packs

2 Likes

Ok, so if for roughly the same amount of time played, the new system gets you ~4000 base gold (levels 1-50), ~5000 extra gold (post level 50) and a bunch of free packs, a couple legendary, a skin, an arena ticket, etc. then how is it worse?

Like I said in another thread, IMO you are NOT the average player. Someone who exclusively grinds for ranked wins and refuses to play BG or Duels or solo adventures is not the typical player.