X to doubt, and it is reprehensible to me even if it is true. Typical of blizzard to ruin a game for some nonsense reason.
That is a misleading statistic. Randomonium is the most āplayedā TB because its the TB with the most early concedes. If it was actually the most popular TB, then you wouldnt see a high percentage of people conceding early.
Most TBs are āone and doneā at most. Fast concedes donāt change that number.
People like making big Timmy plays, which is what Randomonium offers, and thatās precisely whatās wrong with the game right now. Itās haymaker into board clear into haymaker into board clear, every turn.
People would vote for more of that. And they did, with their wallets, the last time Blizz tried to lower the power level, in Year of the Raven. Rastakhanās Rumble was the worst selling set of all time. The next year they went back to massive power creep, sales resumed, and here we are.
1 Like
Randomonium is not one of them. It is easily the moist conceded TB in the history of the game, BY FAR.
Of course its the most āplayedā TB when you get screwed by RNG so often that you conceded early!
Your mate, Jesse Hill, confirmed this on the old forums BTW!
Once early concedes were taken out of the equation, it was NOT the most popular Brawl.
They shouldnāt be ignored though, the highrolls are why the mode is played a lot.
Playing an overwhelming card on turn two and getting a concession is a complete game endpoint for Randomonium. Can you really claim itās all that different from, say, Dungar?
No,. the instant concedes due to LOW rolls is why it was āplayedā so much. They completely ignored how often people were conceding in the first turn or 2 when they made the statement of it being the most āpopularā TB. Confiremed by Jesse on the old forums.
You are wrong. It wasnt the most played because it was popular, it was the most āplayedā because it was far too reliant on RNG deciding the game on turn 1!
Why would the polls be on the forum? Just put it on the game.
1 Like
Nobody can use anything, if your source is YOURSELF. You have to learn how arguments work.
PS itās why most people donāt even reply to most of your posts.
Unlike me they are good at saving their time.
And you have a problem accepting that? Why? Wikipedia got your brain? Well, this isnāt a wikidump, fortunately.
Iād understand if you had a problem with some of my caustic comments or something like that, but this? Come onā¦
And I should care? Especially about some (I underline that part) of those particularā¦ āpeopleā who frequent these forums.
So you want me to be bad (or worse than I am) at it too and re-post the same things (yes, this statement is recursive) for the umpteenth time just to entertain your particular ideas about how posting should be done? Sorry, thatās not happening ā nothing personal, itās just neither interesting to me nor efficient, Iād say itād be Sisyphean, even.
I doubt anyone even understands what heās doing when heās linking to the search of the board with a URL.
It looks like something autogenerated, but itās probably just dumb thinking.
Crosslinking their posts is a violation of the forum rules, btw.
1 Like
When youāre talking about measurable data like player numbersā¦yes?
Carnivore was asking if you were referencing someone who actually did measure the real numbers. Since you instead decided to berate him for it, Iāll just assume you have nothing. Your opinion is as useless as everyone elseās as far as how many people play the game.
2 Likes