Boycott quests if you don't like them

Having played some matches this morning and knowing I am at a rank floor that I don’t mind, I have decided that I will no longer accept matches against quests.

So, if you like your quest deck, I will be handing out free wins in the name my own enjoyment.

I’m looking at you mages, shaman, and warlocks, who made up 70% of my games today.

6 Likes

We disagree most of the time, but this I agree with completely.
Maybe if no one plays the Quests, Team 5 will be forced to admit
they aren’t infallible and the entire idea is trash.

3 Likes

Considering my top played quests are paladin, hunter, and warrior, what then?

… the title sums it up, though.

If you don’t like quests…

Logically, if you enjoy them well then carry on.

But it’s past time to make a dent in their stats by increasing non-games, imo.

1 Like

Except that boycotting by conceding won’t make fewer people play quests. If anything it could make more people play them for the fast and free wins.

I literally played against 6 mages in a row. I’m not saying people shouldn’t play what they like and play to win. but boy howdy does it make for a seriously boring game.

4 Likes

More play would be great, actually. Just like with Ticky, more plays mean more chance of changes.

Non-games are something they track and have been cited as reason for changes in the past.

Ya, it sucks.

Why do quests have rewards at each stage? It makes sense to have a reward at the end of the quest, but a reward midstream that helps you fight and control the board is causing the game to move too fast with minimal interaction.

Playing a deck that kills all your minions and you by turn 6 without ever dropping a minion or interacting with the board is not good game design.

2 Likes

I usually do the same but against priest :joy:

Feel free to concede as much as you want: fun > forcing to play; it won’t change the meta, but you will have a better day

they are questlines, not quests; by design, questlines are 3 steps quests that give a reward at each step

That’s about as ineffective as boycotting chicken sandwiches to influence corporate politics.

3 Likes

More Power to you. Really.

It sucks that team 5 really only hear the community when it rants,boycott,start offending they at Twitter but is really what they do.

Try to be constructive at their twitter/ on a reedit thread and gonna be 100% ignored.

Now rant/offend they and it has 100% chance that in 24 hours you gonna either be trolled or ga text about How bad of a human being you are but know what?

Atleast it’s a answer and show they actually read when you insult.

Funny you mention that because the chicken place actually changed their focus.

I still won’t eat their chicken, though.

1 Like

i like them so i’ll continue to play them on occasion when the mood strikes me.

Plus it’s more fun to create good decks that counter the UiS quests than to auto-concede like someone that clearly doesn’t believe in the heart of the cards.

But not their health insurance.

1 Like

And, as I said, I still don’t eat their food.

1 Like

I don’t eat anything that is seasoned with hate.

4 Likes

Because they considered these “quest chains” not simply quests.

2 Likes

I’ve got a hot take for the forum. I think the Mage questline in a vacuum is fine. I think there are problematic cards from last year that enable unhealthy plays with the Mage questline. Looking at you Incanter’s Flow (even at 3 mana) and Cram Session.

1 Like

Thanks for the free wins I guess?

I agree. If you take out 2 mana draw 4 and 0 mana spells you stop a ton of burst damage.

I like quest just not these quests, there is to much reward for zero risk.