Hmm, that is strange.
I don’t have the paid version but i copy and paste the link and it works just fine for me idk man but the data i see shows those decks as all being positive vs the top 61.27% winrate Galakrond shaman. Wish i could post a pic…
Hmm, that is strange.
I don’t have the paid version but i copy and paste the link and it works just fine for me idk man but the data i see shows those decks as all being positive vs the top 61.27% winrate Galakrond shaman. Wish i could post a pic…
Are you seriously arguing that the Gala Shaman deck doesn’t need nerfs? The decks you’re listing with a minuscule positive winrate are probably built from the ground up simply to counter the Gala deck and they barely break even. The only deck that does have a significant positive win rate is one that doesn’t fight for board control.
No i’m not arguing that the deck doesn’t need nerfs the winrate is too high and too popular. I’m just pointing out that the deck could easily be destroyed if they nerf it too hard because it is kinda slow to start up meaning the mid range needs to be strong to make up for that.
Also just trying to show people that counters do exist and that the data is changing daily.
So you agree this is not a healthy meta, you’re arguing we should live through weeks or months while Blizz fine-tunes the balance changes. Personally, I prefer more frequent changes. Keeps the game feeling fresh.
Na, by all means change something about it and change it now. Its boring playing shaman every other match! Just don’t go overboard with the nerf bat is all i’m saying.
I mean you see many threads with many cards suggested for nerfs targeted at this deck. If they nerf multiple cards for the deck it could kill the deck entirely. Which is something i don’t want.
Also, 51% is not a counter. The only counter is Holy Wrath paladin because it can ignore all the OP shaman crap while it stalls for it’s combo. Tge okd Freeze Mage would probably work well too because it has the same game plan.
I think they gotten better at balance updates since Brode left.
Apart from your link taking me to main meta page, I still see the winrates I said.
I have 0 clue how you’re getting anything different, I’m also, like you, free user.
On hsreplay premium right now showed galakrond shaman only weak to holy wrath with maybe a miniscule edge to quest Hunter also.
Quest Hunter is <1 favored and the gap shrinks as the rank climbs
Yeah its already changed lol but i swear this morning all those decks i listed were in the positive. Crazy how fast things can change in a few hours.
Invoke twice card, the +3/+3 card and toning down the 2x 8/8 rush minions will be the things that get hit I reckon.
Shaman Gala is stupid strong, 5 armour, 5/2 weapon and 2x 8x8 minons is such a power spike, add that you get that all back from Shudder…
I’m sure their intentions were to release an expansion ‘so busted’ that they have to work extra time to fix it. Very smart planning .
you assume that the ones working to fix this mess (developers) are the same people who make the calls about the power level, and/or marketing strategies of the game.
i assure you they are not.
I dont have a picture of me standing next to him, but this is my pet unicorn, Sam:
I call photo shop shenanigans. And youre clearly batman, trying to get as far away from the kitty cat in a party hat as possible!
Did you read his post at all…?
Did you read mine at all? He says no refund for the supporting cards, we’ve been directly told by blizzard that we get a dust refund for any cards they nerf, including those supporting cards
Instead of nerfing, I’d rather they considering increasing the power of some classes not being played to be able to match shaman.
Cards like Chenvaala just isn’t being used compared to Kronx for instance…
*Citation needed
Do you really believe Blizzard is going to dust refund the all cards in Galakrond Shaman, just because they nerf one or two of them?