#facepalm
Can someone explain in idiot because this dude has literally zero idea what she is saying, lmfao
Imagine being this wrong you think you actually make sense.
Yes, predictable behavior is Not addictive! Slowly you will learn. Please read my messages. Maybe they will make sense now. That’s why “all those websites ain’t say it so bro!” Is wrong
Edit. I do apologize for the harsh banter. We are just having a debate. I am sorry
Oh, I think I get what you’re trying to say.
You’re saying that random is expected therefore the rigged is the unexpected.
I told y’all I’m good at this.
One problem, though: that isn’t what random means.
That can’t possibly be what they mean. No one is that dumb…
Lol you aren’t ready for my industry either, friend. 
So you’re literally making up arguments and putting words in my mouth now. Ok. Got it.
You have zero understanding of the research YOU posted, lmfao
I take back what I said. Clearly, I was wrong and someone CAN be
This happens sometimes too. No one bats a thousand.
My bad, I was guessing. Feel free to clarify. Or not. Begging you to clarify is my day job, and I’m not getting paid right now.
Ah yes, when all else fails. Resort to name calling.
No matter how much I want to dislike you, you make it hard. Stop
No, its not.
Maybe, before trying to sound all knowledgeable, do some research.
Their priority should be their shareholders, sure. They have no obligation to rig the game for their shareholders in order to increase profits (?), a claim with little basis in the real world.
Angry people dont spend money. Why anger your clientele? You will LOSE revenue doing so, not increase it.
(For those who don’t know, I can’t post images)
What clientele is angry? The priority IS the shareholders. Duh. Again you don’t understand or know what “rigged” means.
I feel like an army of peasants trying to justify the new Kings tax as “he doesn’t want gold, he just wants the best for us.”
Let’s rephrase this.
Can someone please explain this to me:
Why would a publically traded company refuse legal and known methods of increasing profits?
That’s EXACTLY what people here are saying. That Blizzard would ignore and refuse known legal profits. Please tell me why.
Then those shareholders should be absolutely irate at the fact that Blizzard stopped trading in Russia.
Shareholders are the primary priority, sure. But they have no say in regards to fiscal matters. They cant demand Blizzard rigs the game for (a yet to be proven) financial gain.
I don’t see anyone disagreeing with this. I disagreed with the argument that rigging (in the manner that those on this forum who believe the game is rigged, generally believe the game to be rigged) increases profits.
I don’t agree the game is rigged that way. The game isn’t “screwing” people over.
Scots… I gotta go. I want to say though that I hope we can chat more some day. You are an interesting fellow.
I wish you the best. Thanks for hanging out with me tonight
Well, I haven’t ruled out the possibility of rigging entirely. It’s rigging towards a 50-50 winrate that I believe is pretty thoroughly debunkable, and frankly debunked.
But if you embrace the first while rejecting the second, that puts you in an interesting third position. It would be nice to see some of that expressed as disagreement with the less enlightened, anti-Skinner tinfoil types, as well as with us.
Until next time.
Here’s the problem. You are at the underpants gnome level:
You say psychologically people are going to spend money. What does that even mean?
So you don’t have any proof other than “I say it’s not”
Let’s play the opposite game: let’s assume the game is rigged and we are 100% sure with proof.
What’s the big deal? The game is helping you winning as many games as you are losing because of the algorithm, so, since there are players with a positive winrate, maybe try to get good at the game as well, instead of blaming other factors?