I love how Blizzard keeps the nerf’s hush hush. Like seriously, we have to learn through other sources that confirmed nerf’s and buff’s are coming but we don’t know them until the day they go live?
thats fine if its hushed…ppl should have roughly an idea what they be going after without getting told :)…not exactly sorcery
They do it on purpose to keep you in suspense.
Think of it like how trailers come out for movies.
They want to keep you watching.
You are not making any sense.
well if you think its impossible to guess well…thats just you…many ppl can foresee what will occur…ofc that dont mean 100%
if foreseeing dont make sense to you well…i cant teach you the ability
I think they were saying they literally did not understand your words as a message, rather than that they did not comprehend your meaning.
I agree that we can generally make educated guesses regarding card nerfs, based on card performance, lynchpin capabilities, public perception, and developer comments. Indeed, it is even possible to guess what exactly the nerfs will be with great accuracy!
Buffs are a little harder to guess due to a number of reasons, such as more difficult meta shift predictions and lack of much precedent.
–_____-- …not sure what to say if thats the case(as in writing it in a way that would make sense to him)
actually you can. it’s literally just explaining the logic behind your guesses.
I think it’s incredibly hard to know what they will nerf personally, I never really agree on their based on how you feel ‘nerfs’.
I’m hoping it is like 3 paladin cards, a warrior card and a hunter card, otherwise they are off the mark in my opinion.
The nerfs feel very predicatable. Secret paladin is likely to get two separate ones (just not sure to what yet), one for spell mage, one for rush warrior and maybe one for aggro beast hunter. Those are all the top performers. I was going to add /or tick lock, but that deck has realllly fallen to the wayside in the last couple weeks, so I think its safe for now.
There’s enough buffs that it would be nice to see all classes get one for one of their under-utilized synergies. Things like secret rogue, deathrattle DH, buff priest, elemental shaman etc.
self-explanatory…and i haven’t posted my expections here…i just meant to tell him he should be able to guess from interaction//performance seen in the game which are over the top
Well statistically speaking the spell mage is not that oppressive, if you nerf the deck that is just most popular and fun to play then you’re essentially just making your game less fun, is that not some pretty backward logic?
10 buffs? that’s insane!
So shaman is getting 10 buffs, wow
Tickatus please so we can play other decks apart from aggro.
If ( and that’s a big if) they nerf tick all that people will play in regards to control is priests, no other deck is even close to be able to touch them atm at that is with tick around. Without tick the only way to beat priest is the super aggro deck and don’t think they are big favorite against priests either
Priests farm “super Aggro”. I have been playing it this week.
The main way Priest loses to Aggro is if Aggro Paladin (not Secret, Secret is a joke for Priest) gets a highroll with a bunch of buffs and Priest doesn’t have enough answers on time.
I played against a Hunter. Gave angry Mankrik Apotheosis. What can Hunter ever do about that? LMAO!
Priest loses to Weapon Rogue and Spell Mage. Too much uninteractive damage.
Ahh ok, and prime candidates for nerfs are spell mage and for reason tickatus… all hail our new overlords the priests! Sigh no way I am going to play in a meta where 40% of the matches are against priests… guess it’s time for a break if the indeed nerf tick
Refreshing Spring Water and Crabrider are the first two cards shown. The second neutral is almost certainly Mankrik Enraged.
TikTok is almost certainly also getting nerfed for causing bad feelings.
You can also get Priests with Clown Druid.
Additionally, Paladin and Warrior nerfs are bad for Priest. So Priest won’t gain overlord status from the nerfs.
“2 neutral cards will be nerfed, including a murloc”.
I wonder what neutral murloc they could possibly refer to