It’s actually funny that you bring up the dunning-kruger effect.
Like for example – some random guy on a forum saying that Asmongold, a professional streamer who plays games for a living, is bad and doesn’t know what he’s talking about – despite having thousands of hours of relevant experience – which in most cases quite literally makes you an expert at something.
The sheer audacity is astounding. Might as well be auditioning to be the mascot for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
You can’t conflate an opinion as a skill issue unless you believe the other person to be inferior to you and your ability. If we approach each other as peers on the same level, and we disagree on something – then we have a difference of opinions. But that’s not what you’re saying.
So to know nothing about a person and assume they are unskilled based on an opinion – you’re insinuating that the person notably less skilled than you are.
To know that someone has made a career out of something, and to still assert that they are inferior to you – someone who is not skilled enough to make a career out of playing games… I don’t think you could get a better example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
Statistically speaking, we’re all reasonably near average - and the difference between our skill level in that case would be barely measurable. You aren’t going to see dramatic differences in raw skill at anything until you start getting into the upper upper percentiles. Let’s stick with the MMA example. Someone with a 25:25 record in MMA could beat someone with a 35:15 record. Not likely – but it’s not out of the question. Someone with a 25:25 record beating someone with a 48:0 record would take an act of god.
Considering the curve and how skill gaps range from basically negligible for most of the curve to insurmountable at the tail end…
Calling someone bad implies that the delta between you and the person you’re referring to is significant. (Unless of course you state ahead of time that you’re equally bad.) So either you’re inflating your own ability to a ridiculous margin, or your deflating the value of the person you’re calling bad by a ridiculous margin.
In most cases calling someone bad isn’t constructive criticism or a valid reason to justify diminishing their opinion… It’s just an attempt to assert that you’re better than they are and attempt to get under their skin. It’s not rooted in logic.
If anything in demonstrates a lack of the ability to articulate a real reason why their opinion might be rooted in something flawed. Or – in most cases you just have different opinions on what you enjoy.
And considering that we live in a reality that is as far as we can tell governed by cause and effect – if someone has an experience that leads to a negative opinion – it is worth the developers time if it is a common opinion, because it likely means that there is a root cause that could be addressed to keep their vision and reduce friction players are having to share the experience the developers are hoping to create.