However, in another thread you did state your support for eliminating all respecs, decreasing high rune drop rates, and adding more immunities to monsters.
I do not begrudge it. I just point out the logical flaw in that FFA loot makes the game harder when in reality instanced loot is harder in terms of gearing up.
In real life, when misinformation is not challenged and debunked, more people believe the lies.
This one above, and this one below, you simply made up.
But dropped high run rates back to pre1.11 levels I am fine with.
The internet never forgets.
Youâve used someone elses comment and attributed it to me you idiot lol, that list isnât mine.
Yet you knew this, but you are just twisting again.
The list was the first post in that âHarmless Changesâ thread. You made the second post in that thread stating that you agreed with all the changes in the OP except #5.
Those arenât things I want, I just agreed with someone elseâs suggestions could have merit, but that doesnât mean that they are my changes or desires for the game.
For someone who wants everyone to believe is he more intelligent, you have done a really bad job at twisting this time, literally trying to attribute someone elseâs words to me, just pathetic.
I think my interpretation makes sense.
Okay so what you have done here is you have deliberately cropped the name of the poster, who is another forum user , but thatâs okay because you forgot to trim out the bottom of his Avatar, which is clearly not mine, so that is fine.
Other than that pish, again, those arenât changes I want or advocate for, though most could fall under small QoL changes, not like Personal loot for the chronically selfish, and we both know who that is, but again, you cannot attribute changes one person makes, to someone else, thatâs just common sense.
your not doing yourself any favors atm man, I am not going to take sides in your fight on who is right about each aspect of the games you want changed or not changed but you did say you agree with everything but 1 thing the OG posted in this thread which included eliminating respecs and adding more immunities.
I donât know what you are talking about âmanâ, Agreeing with ideas someone else has doesnât mean you become an advocate for it. In my opinion, they could come under small QoL yea, they arenât bad ideas, but I donât advocate for them, so what is your point âmanâ? I donât get it? What are you trying to prove?
all that was stated is you expressed your support for those things, no one ever said you were championing the cause for them in the argument you are having in this thread.
But what I am saying is, who cares if I nod in approvement of another persons ideas? That happens all in the time. So tell me, what is your point?
This concept is imminently difficult for a whole lot of people to grasp. Sometimes itâs not worth explaining.
my point is to say donât argue you didnât do something just admit you either misspoke or explain your meaning and move on donât fight over if you said something you clearly did.
When Did I say that? It was put to me that I WAS an advocate for things
Here, above. What I am saying to you is, who cares if I agree with the OPâs ideas? They are his ideas, just because I agree they could come under QoL, not bad ideas, does not mean I become an advocate for them, which is what Micro was Twisting with. There was no âmisspokeâ, nothing to âadmitâ to, I agree his ideas have merit, but I donât advocate for them.
There is no argument but what is coming from you.
ad¡vo¡cate
noun
/ËadvÉkÉt/
âhe was an untiring advocate of economic reformâ
/ËadvÉËkÄt/
âthey advocated an ethical foreign policyâ
If someone is on a soap box or platform and advocating for an idea, you can stand in the crowd and agree, but you are not âadvocatingâ by doing so. To claim someoneâs ideas have merit, weight, purpose, or authenticity to them is not the same as publicly advocating.
There, I took the effort to elaborate it out.
Personally, I never used the word advocate or any of its derivatives. The claim that I made was that you supported specific changes since you agreed with another poster about making specific changes to the game. I listed out some of those specific changes.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Yea but supporting kinda is advocating for it, the word âsupportingâ has connotations, I donât think his ideas are bad, most of them come from previous versions of D2, so itâs not like personal loot, and how game breaking and ruinous that would be, so who really cares if I agreed someones ideas had merit like 4-5 days ago or whenever it was, you actually advocate for ruinous changes micro, so you need to respect that position you are in, because people in glass houses really shouldnât throw stones where game changes are concerned.
That was my point. There are some things that you support that are game changing. Adding more immunities to monsters is definitely game changing and would impact end game builds.
In contrast, personal loot does not change any end game build. The same builds will still be best. The best in slot items will still be best. With supporting adding more monster immunities in D2R, this has significant implications. In comparison, my suggestions are quite modest in comparison.
IF Barb disagrees. With find item, youâd now have to make sure each other player in the Chaos Sanctuary was truly out of range, rather than just out of pickup-range.
Edit - I know you probably meant âchangeâ any buildâŚbut itâs not true they donât affect that build. P loot would slow down find item quite a bit.