yes but 30 of each mid rune (sol-lem) and only 18 pul make a vex. which is pretty easy to farm those mid runes if you had stash space for them. once again math and logic failed you, as anyone farming runes would get an assortment and not need to farm only one rune to cube up. silly tbqh.
So 288 runes total per Vex, and you also need enough relevant gems for the cube as well. Nothing about that is a problem. It’s astonishing that you think this math isn’t supporting my position.
he blamed me for his mistake, im not the one started talking about it again.
i never defined lem as THE mid rune. was just an example again you hang yourself on it. i can send you a pillow with lem on it if you want… fml
I heard them cry already the moment you mentioned rebalance droprates
The whole point is that the market is already flooded to the fullest with items. If we start to be able to stack them there will be even less compromises. I just don’t like it.
I am not convinced that stacking runes/gems/keys/etc… is going to have such a significant impact on the market. A few middle runes are going to be worth slightly less, but that’s all (low runes are hardly tradable anyways).
You say it’s not QoL, then when I explain it’s QoL, you say “yes, and?”. My point was just that it makes something that we cuold do before (store as many runes as we wanted to bother with) easier, which is by definition quality of life.
Thank youf or explaining a little bit more of your reasoning, rather than arguing about whether it’s QoL.
I personally don’t think it should stack in inv, as the limitation with inv space and charms, etc. is more likely an intended compromise where you have to choose between power and number of town trips, than in stash. In Stash I would love either stacking or UI to let me keep all the “mat” type items.
I do agree that it’s possible this change would change the trading market though, if it no longer takes dedication to store so many mid-runes and gems, I could see more people picking them up, leading to fewer people needing to buy them. I suspect there will be many who still don’t bother to collect and cube up Pgems though, and likely true for the mid to HR rune conversion as well.
I think the advantages are worth the potential to change trading though, since trading is already pretty variable supply:demand as season goes on. I do understand YMMV and it’s okay to not agree there.
In terms of characters lots I also think we should have 50 minimum in order to enjoy all game modes.
My ideal situation would be crafting UI or stash stacking and enough shared stash tabs that mules could be eliminated for all but the most dedicated hoarders, in addition to 50 character slots to enjoy all the fun builds.
Stacking aside I like the extra space for collecting sets/unique for leveling alts and grailing, so I’d be sad if we dropped down to lower storage space, but your suggestion of at least giving you slots per game mode would be nice in terms of not being slot locked and not able to play a season. I’d prefer more total slots and be able to divide them across game modes as I see fit, though.
i also stated more than once, that its not “only” qol, sure that quality of life would come along with that change.
just because i mentioned that stacking runes and gems are not QoL you start to hang yourself on any little detail i could miss in a line.
I agree that would be a really nice change that comes along with that. yet just like you say there will be someone who can sell them because he still collected thoose and didnt took most of the runes instead, i think that’s a compromise he took that someone wouldn’t need to take if you could stack them.
If this is positive or negative im mere opinion. Still a pure QoL feature does not effect the whole market even the slightest imo. Putting cain closer to the wp in a5, that is QoL.
It’s the argument that you made. Do you not know how discussions work? People listen to what you have to say, and then respond to it. If you’re now revoking what you said, then you’re admitting that you’re wrong.
So tell me where did I say that Lem is the only mid rune. I just took Lem as example there, i could have said pul too wtf is your point. What would be the difference now if I said Pul, that it’s more realistic in your eyes? Man get the heck calm with your stupid Lem ffs. You talking from up high like if you’re very little in real life.
You used Lem as an example because it’s the absolute highest rune that you could still call a mid rune. Even using that, it was an asinine statement to say that players would easily crush hundreds of mid runes up to high runes. You got caught being dumb and having stupid opinions, deal with it.
Do you think that taking pride in being wrong somehow means that you were right the whole time? Your position has been dismantled. Your opinion on the matter is completely destroyed. You wanted “easy high runes” to be a point against stacking runes, and yet it’s not.
Explain me more where it got destroyed? And where do I take pride in beeing “wrong”. I didn’t say Easy HR’s, I said easier. You act like I said that the whole game would change if we implement stacking. You try to teach me how to have a discussion talking from the top and twisting my words and then saying I said you have easy HRs or some BS. I can’t take you serious boi. go to hell lol xD
the only one who had good arguments pro rune/gem stacking was insidious. you just read half and twist my words to then teach me how to talk.
sure man whatever you just don’t want to accept that when i say it changes something that i dont mean it changes the whole game, sorry you horizon is so small.