when did i say a buff that is countered with a nerf cant be a wash? for the 3rd attempt you seem to be arguing against something im not saying? you dont win arguments by arguing something no one is saying. you are debating like a child.
1 Like
my sole argument was that it is a buff and you have agreed with it 5 times while arguing against things im not saying.
Who said you said that? I said that, can you not read? I just answered it for you because I can do the math. Meanwhile I don’t need to win, you’ve already lost. Thanks for playing though.
But see we’re all talking in grand hypotheticals here. I proposed to you a solution to power creep. You can’t handle that is destroyed your argument so you want to focus on only part of the math problem.
Dude, leave them its pointless to argue with these charm inventory fanatics.
1 Like
what did i lose, my only argument was that it is a buff. so for me to lose you would have to prove it is not a buff which you have not. i also dont think you are even remotely capable of the math required to counter the buff but thats not relevant
which is not if
- cube and tomes only work in charm inventory
or
- charm inventory has 8 cells less than loot/regular inventory
This reminds me of PoE gems.
Big meh.
1 Like
Doesn’t matter if I handle the math or some dev does. Regardless the scenario was proposed, you focused on the first part of the problem, but not the entire problem. You’re dodging the scenario because is destroys your argument.
Regardless there will never be a charm inventory so it really doesn’t matter.
No! You cannot make a second proposed portion of an update!!! Only buff, talk, ignore any possible ways to remove that possibility!!!
-slprywhnwet
That is as retarded as the charm inventory idea.
You have separate space to carry stuff, you never have to choose on removing charms.
That alone makes it a buff
au contraire. i have focused on it being a buff because so many are arguing it is QoL (how this all started) then YOU tried to say the buff can be countered so its a non issue but
a) no kidding, everyone knows you can balance anything
b) doesnt change the argument of it is a buff or not other than AGREE with me that it is a buff
i never rejected the scenario of balancing it. i would likely be against it since i have no faith in the devs and that is a massive amount of time to do right and I think there are better uses of time
you can absolutely make other proposals, but those proposals arent in conflict of my argument that the initial ideas were buffs. you see that right?
like someone said x + y = 5 and we all know y is 3, so then i say x is 2 but then you come in and say yeah but what is y is 2 now then x is 3 so you are wrong. im sure thats too many numbers for you but thats exactly what you are doing
why the time i spend staring at my stash/inventory is so important?
your concept of buff is not a popular one
Uhhh
Poe gems are skills
This is merely finding a way to add a charm inventory in a non invasive and lorewise manner lol
no its a way for you to get buffs without saying they are buffs because you cannot handle a trade off. you cant handle immunity trade offs, you cant handle charm trade offs. you are at least consistent on what you struggle with.
it would be so cool if the charm inventory was a reward for completing a new act 4 quest, quest given by any of those merchants, something like “slay x demon in outer steppes”
this would give a purpose for that area
This is where you look like a fool
My suggestion makes you have less GC slots lol 6 in total, almost half less then currently
And yet you keep arguing like I’m trying to buff charms potential
I’m reducing it and making each of them more equally used
I could argue that a 4slot buff is practically no buff at all because that would be the only difference gained.
I never disagreed that the 4slots is 100% a buff no matter how 1% it may be. Again if fully negated, or even if it was overly negated it wouldn’t be an issue in the least bit so why even worry about said buff. You need the tiniest possible issue to pretend as if it would have any real affect on the game which we both know it won’t.
I actually agree on not having any faith in devs overall, but if they took maybe 6 months they could probably balance it just fine. Any real team it would take like 2 minutes and a kitkat bar. And no, it wouldn’t be a massive amount of time to figure out how to average the gain on 4slots of inventory space. Hell they could double it making the game a little harder certainly wouldn’t hurt.
There are better uses of their time for sure, like TZ… So why not take a second and make looting easy, and honestly it really shouldn’t even take that much time. Maybe they have a to bring on a real coder, but they could probably get it done on their lunch break.
I wouldn’t mind
Would be cool to gamify the acquisition of it
Like I think act 2 hall of dead quest should increase your cube size in nm and Hell
1 Like
this is a great idea actually
lol
That is definitely the worst idea for a charm inventory I’ve EVER seen. And probably one of the top 20 dumbest gifs I’ve ever seen, too. Geez. >.>
1 Like
People still say Its not a buff, hahahahahaha. We found the NOOBS.
PvM. charm inventory= BUFF
PVP. charm inventory=BUFF.