Zekvyr still Impossible on BM hunter

7 months in, fully geared 633 ilvl mythic raider, and still can’t beat Zekvyr because he instantly one-shots BM pets in first second of fight. I don’t expect Blizz to ever fix this. But thought I’d post anyway.

3 Likes

its like this by design, just turn off growl. zekvir will always 1shot or do like 60-80% of your pet’s health

9 Likes

I had a heck of a time getting Brann to cooperate and not get feared straight out the room, so the fight would reset. I ran it as heals, let Brann tickle Zek to death.

7 Likes

Handled the cocoons as heals? Nice work.

6 Likes

Do NOT start the fight with your pet out.
Summon it in a few seconds later. Md yourself or bran.

The key is YOU get initial threat established and not your pet. Otherwise it will get one shot every time.

But it’s also meant to be like this so you can’t cheese the fight by using your pet.

4 Likes

Zekvir is prob easiest on BM Hunter if not near easiest. This is a skills issue.

5 Likes

WtB an interrupt as Priest healer.

8 Likes

Likewise for Resto Druid.

1 Like

They have Skull Bash in general tree

But hes a mythic raider

Guess I missed that when I searched for “interrupt” in the skill tree window. I’ll have a look, thanks.

1 Like

Doesn’t matter how gear you are, BM Hunter’s pet are terrible right now. Feels like pets are made out of toilet paper. Blizzard needs to bring back pet talents to made them strong again.

4 Likes

37 Likes

But but but, it’s impossible!

5 Likes

Those don’t count

11 Likes

There was more, but I thought that was enough for comedic effect and to /thread. lmao

17 Likes

You know what is a skill issue. Devs unable to communicate with the players

That video makes me so mad. Just like the whole do not play demonology

:ocean: :crab: :ocean: :crab:

1 Like

Players really hate it when devs communicate though.

3 Likes

Then it’s a skill issue we both have lol

Although I’m here. As are yall most days ready to initiate a conversation

:crab: :ocean: :crab: :ocean:

1 Like

If dev communication was more frequently blunt and honest instead of weaselly and self-serving, it would be better received. They like to just drop changes and make up some wishy-washy excuse and then not respond when that reasoning gets punched full of holes.

“We’re doing X because we want higher player retention numbers.” Whoops, that sounds bad… is it the wording that’s the problem, or the action itself?

4 Likes