<that_winning_kids.gif>
on a certain level you had to admire his persistence though, he had like 9000000 variations of that name at the end,lol
Are you TRULY saying that about Fesz? Come on, the guyâs retired and posts in here 24/7, complains about classic being âas orcishly possibleâ, and your excuse for him is THAT?
come on bro, thats what they made those baby gym thingys.
1 Like
I hope they donât actually. I hope they just simply donât add them. Because if they say something, it will trigger every petty little desire to be voiced one hundred fold in hopes of a blue response.
Thereâs no need for a change to Classic to add Guild Banks. If they decided to put them in, then Iâd want a blue post with âplz explainâ.
Remember how he always said that I said that traveling to a dungeon wasnât a social experience, but I (truthfully) clarified that by correcting him, saying that it wasnât social if everyone hops on a flight point to pee, and he kept claiming I never said that?
I had a link to that post the whole time. Shame I never got to mic drop it.
1 Like
Thousands of posts, and you really think they wonât address it?
Honestly Iâd be shocked if they added them, and it would make no difference in what people ask for, people have asked for their version of what they think Classic should be from the announcement.
he meant he hoped they donât add them. well pretty sure thats what he meant.
Re-read it. I think he means that he hopes they donât mention it. Meaning, he doesnât want to see ANY mention of it.
Both actually. The argument âBlizzard hasnât said noâ gains weight if they keep posting No to irrelevant things that are all but guaranteed not to be included.
Now granted blizz blind sided us with loot trading. The gbank debate has rolled on since like week 1 of the original forums and the resistance has been quite strong by a few posters. Opposed to a change that is basically a log and in game UI viewable by the guild.
Which is far far less impactful than loot trading. Yea. Sure there were threads made. There were also a lot of proponents to loot trading as well. None of those threads have had the intensity of this topic. Just doesnât balance outâŚsmells a bitâŚfunnyâŚ
oh he said both, oh yah, i think they will say something, but not add them.
Odd. The vehemence was definitely there in loot trading. Here itâs more like âGah, stop raising silly ideasâ.
thatâs it though, irrelevant to you, but maybe not to someone else, just like how you may like 1.5 av and someone else likes 1.12, there are not too many topics that gain too much traction that they would address specifically.
1 Like
No other topic seems to have gotten as much attention as guild banks. I seriously doubt Blizzard wonât address it.
1 Like
I donât really get why thereâs so many posts. I mean its basically someone wanting extra bag slots. Thereâs no justification for it besides âI wantâ.
My opposition is more to the attitude of âIf I annoy them enough theyâll give inâ which is what destroyed WoW the first time.
If thatâs all youâre taking away from the conversation, you missed 99.9999999% of the rest of the topics.
1 Like
The arguement for was âgroup with friendsâ to stop the loot trading ninjas. It split the forums. Lol
Let me guess. That was just trollingâŚ
1 Like
There are a lot of âI wantâ topics.
But the arguments here about security and logging are afterthoughts to justify bag slots.