How am I pay to win?
You Pay… You win.
Literally no different then Twinks. You only choose to play in a Different Bracket.
Its ok according to him and the rest of endgame crowd. Imbalances caused by gear are in fact a good thing at 120, but anywhere else in the game it needs separating.
6 Likes
I don’t think you know what that means.
You’re the one who Miss-used it in the first place.
I was only following you logic.
(There’s literally no such thing as “Pay to Win” in WoW.)
1 Like
Not at max level as much, but I hear a lot about gold invested in people’s twinks.
FAR Less then at max level. A Typical Twink literally cost less then a MAX level player spends in a single week of Max content… Some Max players spend that much EVERY DAY.
2 Likes
True, but that only applies to mythic raiders pushing content due to the inflated cost of flasks etc.
1 Like
Vokaro said it best.
Anyways I’m not some bully trying to beat up lowbies. I have no intention or desire to meet him anywhere in the game on any character. As I said, I’m proving a point.
That point is, if people are annoyed I am suggesting that a level 50 or whatever and a level 120 should be fighting when Blizzard literally split us into different PVP brackets, then I argue it is hypocritical to suggest I am a prick for suggesting it. Since the topic at hand is the discussion of different character types split by Blizzard into different brackets. “It sucks they split us, unless it’s something bad for me personally then we should stay split”.
If you don’t see what I mean, you’re too emotionally invested. Back up a tad.
1 Like
“So what?” Idk why i expected something better. No one is denying you an unfair fight, gear up that 120 and outgear everyone in your bracket. No one is stopping you at all.
1 Like
No, you’re TRYING to prove a point that has no basis or foundation so it’s falling flat.
But they AREN’T “Different Character types”. At most, they’re different PLAYER Types.
A better Analogy that you SHOULD of used was if they seperated Players according to CLASS.
THEN, you may of made your point.
You would of still been wrong, but at least your point would of been humorous.
The Irony of YOU accusing others of being “too emotionally invested” is your funniest joke yet.
1 Like
You’re a twink, I’m assuming you’re too biased to see. Honestly it doesn’t matter what you think of what I said or not.
I don’t play the lowbie brackets so what do I care, just making conversation and cranking your guys gears up a little. Even with all that blue BiS dungeon armor, your skin manages to be very thin.
1 Like
You know what they say about assumptions.
Clearly, you care a great deal or else you wouldn’t have tried so hard.
You post a Fallacy and when you get called out for it, you try to hide behind false Apathy.
This is a great idea and an actual solution. Hope devs get to actually see this.
You know what they say about assumptions.
Got anything in your psychology flip book about delusions?
Twinks already can’t pop queues and now the solution is to… deincentivize levelers? Congrats dude you just successfully killed every bracket with ridiculous queue times. The fact that you can’t get queues to pop shows that twinks themselves don’t even want to PvP, so who would be left and what would those queues look like? (Free tip, exactly the same as XPOff now if not worse).
Just an all-around terrible idea brosef, like screen door on a submarine bad.
3 Likes
Once again, bgs were just fine without xp. There were twinks and non twinks. Just because someone doesnt twink, doesnt mean they wont play in XP-less bgs.
Bro, you are comparing current game to 3.2?!? You really think removing the biggest incentive for pre-endgame PVP (that btw has been in the game for a decade) would have no effect on queue times? Bruuuuh, lol come on stop playin
1 Like
Incentive should be pvp that’s all you need
1 Like
Isn’t that already a thing in the xpoff brackets though?
1 Like