Xmo: 2100+ Mage/Rogue WOTLK S6 2v2 Arena

Ok.

saying mage rogue is braindead means you are either stuck on tbc or never played the comp, or you are just too bad that you get beat by every mage rogue

2 Likes

LOL it all makes sense. Poor braindead mage/rogue player who got free 2400 is all upset. Also on faerlina.

i don’t play RM, and one of the reasons its because requires the mage to be a god on higher mmr against good players, and perfect setups/coordination, you wouldnt understand you are barely 2k

You struggled to get/maintain 2k for weeks, then shot up to 2350. How much that boost cost you?

i simply played up to 2k and didnt play anymore, what you talking about lol

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/roguemage-is-lowest-skill-required-2s-comp-in-tbc/1265224/10

Don’t ask me.

It was in TBC and is in Cata. But in wotlk its one of the weakest of the viable 2v2 comps, and it’ll be completely garbage by ICC patch.

There are usually 0 Rogue/Mage teams on the wmane arena ladder by S8.

Rogue/Spriest is an entirely different animal in WOTLK and remains one of the best 2v2 comps throughout wotlk. In fact, its the only good dbl dps comp for rogues by S8.

2 Likes

disc feral is 20 times easier to climb than rogue mage

2 Likes

so you don’t have an informed opinion, you’re just parroting someone else’s nonsense

1 Like

we are talking about wrath rogue mage bro, but i think your name says it all

Nope. Seeing if they reply to themselves. You just jumped in.

They did reply though: I didn’t inform them. That isn’t my thing.

I am writing a paper on platform manipulation and the phenomenon of trolling.

What’s with the sour grapes? At least this comp requires voice comms and some coordination, unlike 90% of the current popular 2s comps.

It’s almost nostalgic seeing R/M, insane how hard they fell off in popularity since TBCC

More sour grapes with a “detective twist”

1 Like

i still get surprised on how slow this guys are at times

i played through this exact rating last night and we saw 1 mage/rogue. 1700-1900 has a lot of people just capping 10 games, we saw a prot warr, a blood dk, and an arcane mage for example.

Rogue itself is popular in 2s but they’re garbage in 5s and fairly rare in 3s

tried to edit my old post but my forum site is tripping out hardcore

I played aff/hpala for a bit.

You do not want to play this comp ever lmao.

oh look who i found in AB

``https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/227313563008499712/1088917238507126805/image.png´´

KEKW

Blockquote

Can confirm, barely see RM in the 2k+.

RM really isn’t much of a problem as it might have been in tbc. As others have mentioned, obviously depends on your class, but meta > all unless you perform everything perfectly… and even then you still might lose as a non meta. Eg. Dk teams who lose to us (SpR - seem to not understand the game and just got the rating due to their class). There also seems to be bracket blocks where certain comps can’t climb others in specific ratings (this is just my opinion, haven’t looked at charts).

I don’t know about WOTLK, but those 2 classes were top of the skillcap in BC. Though I really dislike those, but they weren’t classes that everybody can play.

1 Like

Lol evil but funny

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.