To be totally fair on Krazule, it’s a confessions thread and he’s… confessing, to something, I guess. Still, I think his takes are pretty bad. I’d like to offer my formal contention, as MY confession
I myself am not partial to noble RP, but Kailarra makes a really good point. The wealthy nobles had a higher likelihood of survival. I guess from that standpoint it makes sense that there’d be a lot of noble RP about. Though, tbh, I’d appreciate it if Blizzard actually fleshed out to what extent Quel’thalas is an aristocracy vs a meritocracy - on one level the Farstriders, Magisters and Blood Knights seem to be the factions that hold the balance of power, and don’t necessitate nobility. The only direct example of nobility we have is Lord Saltheril, who largely seems to be making demands of Fairbreeze Village while contributing nothing meaningful to Sin’dorei society? I dunno, I’d like to see more explanation of Sin’dorei nobles in lore before judging this one fully.
My demon hunter, a blood elf who I don’t really RP much but Mean-To-At-Some-Point is a blood elf. He was a spellbreaker originally, but when Kael pledged his service to Illidan he gladly followed suit, and tried to learn Illidan’s ways of feeding magic addiction, to save his people. In that sense, he became a Demon Hunter FOR his people. He believed in the Illidari because they helped his people - even giving them M’uru, arguably. When he returns to his home, why would he want to be an edgy outcast? He would want to re-assimilate with the people he gave everything to save.
Nothing wrong with a demon hunter hanging out like a normal person. Nothing wrong with a demon hunter remaining edgy and distant. It depends on the character’s experiences and motives.
They’re undead, not dead. I main a death knight, and I’ve got to say, they’re extraordinarily complex.
What lore mandates about death knights is that they are undead, or at least soulless and infused with necromancy to the point that, like Scourge necromancers, they are de facto undead. Also, they feel the overwhelming compulsion to cause suffering, and literally cannot resist doing so now and again. As such, they’re designed to be murder machines. So, yes, they’re not normal living. But it’s worth noting that there’s a lot of complexity in that.
My death knight is a former Scarlet Crusader, killed and raised during the early stages of the original DK starting experience, ICly. Her whole story revolves around free will - the revelation that free-willed undeath IS possible, that she can still be “human” even though the Scourge killed her. As such, she’s latched herself onto the Forsaken, other free willed undead of Lordaeron, and very much intends to use her ‘second chance at life’ to make a difference in the world. So she very much interacts in society. Even the darker aspects of her nature are used for the good of the Horde overall - when in Orgrimmar she used to go on weekly quillboar hunts.
I guess my point is, there’s more complexity to DKs than being undead scourge monsters glaring at everyone in corners, and occasionally muttering “suffer well”. By all means, some DKs may be like that. But others are seeking a second chance at life, trying to find a new purpose. Thassarian’s arc in Wrath was a very good example of this - fighting for the Alliance and ultimately reuniting with his living sister. After all they’ve done, why can’t Death Knights try to live a normal life, within the scope of their condition?