worst than any cheese mechanic. the class has to much overall damage for arena.
I dont even care about the burst they bring.
15 Likes
I have an alt WW and its not as completely busted as you might think. Like i do believe they will get some damage nerfs, but its going to be a fine line to walk. If they get over nerfed on damage, they will be at huge risk of being completely deleted from the game.
Their defenses are so incredibly awful. Basically a glass cannon. and sure, the mobility helps, but youâve got one trinket karma before every 30 sec CD stun becomes a major threat of 100-0 death, especially in 3s.
I feel like 99% of the complaints come from 2s in healer v healer games where WW will out PVE most healer comps. This is not a reason to delete a class from 3v3. 2s always has this issue and will still have it if WW is nerfed. Some other melee dps, probably warrior, will just take over that role.
4 Likes
yea if they nerf damage output then defensives need a buff
Sorry, but why doesnât the ladder reflect your opinion?
2 Likes
I canât believe youâre actually trying to pull this off your *** to defend WWs LOL
Youâre even more annoying than on beta forums.
That being said I just think that theyâre slightly overtuned, Iâm not sure if a 5-10% damage nerf at most would be something desirable. I feel like their kyrian ability holds too much power in it too. Disarm not being affected by rele is super annoying too 
Edit : Yeah, I just wished there was an ignore functionallity, wouldnât have to read bloomsday trolls everyday 
6 Likes
I asked a simple question. You donât like my posts? Feel free to ignore me, itâs not like that I would miss you or you would hurt my feelings or something! 
There is. Click onto my name, view activity. Top right corner there are two buttons, âNormalâ and âView Profileâ. Click on âNormalâ and change it to âIgnoredâ. Timeframe is up to you, but feel free to take âForeverâ!
Enjoy your life!
I love when people like you change char to an alt right before crying on the forums. Post on your main and own what you say
2 Likes
So were hunters not viable in S3 of BfA since none got R1 or is ladder representation of lesser played specs (ie WW in PvP) a stupid argument and you should stop quoting this to protect your S tier melee from being nerfed?
1 Like
I imagine dance of chi ji is going to get hit, itâs quite clearly an overtuned talent in pve and pvp, of course it doesnât help that the other two options on that row are damn near worthless.
Windwalker is historically the least played spec in the game, even when it has been quite strong. If you look at the total number of priest and warrior players for example compared to wind walker the amounts would be astronomically different I would expect.
But I donât know how to try and find those numbers. But looking at representation of WClogs, ww has always been low and still is.
Representation is just not a good indicator of a class viability if taken alone. Itâs fallacious trying to defend a spec (one way or another) based on that (especially WW).
Every high rated player knows the spec is S tier and I bet you will see a lot of tourny playtime (ww/firemage etc.)
1 Like
I am from EU. I canât post with another toon!
No hunter got R1?
Any proof for that claim?
Indeed, a stupid post from you. Try again!
Pretty sure DH is. And there have been several experiments from external websites, that checked how the representation changed witch patchnotes. A class got buffed, people play this class a lot more often. A class got nerfed, people dropped the class and jumped onto the next fotm.
So if WW is as broken as the noobs claim, the representation would jump through the roof!
I agree. The viable comps are a lot better indicator of how viable a class is. Because a class alone canât beat the competition, as it is team based. So any comp with ww s-tier alone? Or are there a couple of s-tier comps right now, leading by RMP as usual?
Anyways, the ladder representation is a statistic tool to take a look at. Because the viable comps are reflected in the class/spec representation.
Or would you really say. "Hey class x hasn't a viable comp to play with, but is super broken, so should be nerfed!"Obviously you wouldnât, right?
Xuxu your debate club application is pending review
EU applicants take significantly longer to process
Hot take they need to delete every single crit% bonus in the game with the crits doing the damage they are now
I think like 1 on EU did. Both Dilly and Ssds missed on NAâs ladder. It was also the same time Dilly was telling people like you throwing stupid stats around that it was dumb because representation = / = viability.
You can keep flapping your stupid euro gums all you want, WW is overtuned and gonna get the ban hammer.
Enjoy being a pustule for a little while longer with the âHMMM LOOK AT THE REP HMMMMMMMMâ argument that nobody above 5th grade or a BfA Destro is going to take seriously.
2 Likes
Damn that ignore button is so cool, glad I clicked on that thread 
Guys⊠KITE. Kite the hell out of them, thats all you gotta do.
Let me guess, your failed!
So they were able to play in the tournament but havenât gotten rank 1? Well, easy to check.
On EU 11 Hunter (ĐДлĐșŃĐ·ĐŽ, Illustrated, Facilez, KĂąsĂčxĂžxĂž, ĐŃŃĐ”ĐČĐŸĐŽ, KĂĄsĂșxĂžxĂž, Mariabanks, Feedbert, Doubleright, Bicmex, Theslav)
On US 2 Hunter (Dillon, Sgtsus)
Donât know where you got it from that they havenât gotten rank 1, as the cutoff was 3311 and they were 3454 / 3452.
Report worthy. Especially because it came from a NA guy.
Oh well? So why are all the noobs taken the argument for 2s representation for example? And btw, how do you want to judge then? Based on your stomach feeling and your subjective biased low rated experience? I thought you guys have learned from Donald how to not do it.
1 Like
Iâm going to assume English isnât your first language, because this genuinely made no sense
but thatâs ok, Iâm proud of u
It isnât, but remove the r and we are fine? So what is your issue?
I was told in school we start sentences in uppercase! Did you think that was cool or funny? If not, you got what I think about your statement: embarrassing!