WTB Dual Spec - One Change Blizzard

Idk exactly what tanks you’re referring to, but I PvP as arms/fury and I tank when I PvE. I am spending 200+g a week just constantly going back and forth from prot to arms and the only way I can make it back is either through mining, or doing dungeons/heroics I dont want to for a fee, which doesnt happen immediately.

I won’t charge a fee if I didn’t have to respec so frequently.

I didn’t. It just wasn’t fun to do dungeons in buildings so I skipped most of them on my hunter. The game would have been much better for hunters if that BC change was added in classic. It was an obvious mistake the original devs made.

1 Like

Tanks, more than anyone, will benefit the most. I promise you that tanks dont want to stay tanks always. dps as a prot warrior is HORRENDOUS.!!! farming marks of sarg/fel arms is not ez as a prot warrior, its very time consuming and not enjoyable. I will give my right kidney for dual-spec.

2 Likes

I am literally limited with the type of content I can do at times, because I have to spend half my playing time making gold in order to respec. Like… That is not a good time. I am not going to level another warrior JUST to PvE. If it was easy and fast to level, sure. But we all know that isn’t the case… Anyways, I digress, I think I made my point.

1 Like

One last thing. Dual spec will promote both PvP and PvE gameplay. It is very rare for you to have the same spec for both PvE and PvP, so I see no world in how this is a negative addition to th egame.

It is, they “fixed” it for you - for $40 you don’t have to level 1-58 anymore.

1 Like

No, I am not buying a level 58 boost because I don’t want to. I also don’t want to spend almost 2 weeks leveling from 58-70. If you have that type of time, more power to you friend. I don’t unfortunately.

More people coming onto the forums asking for changes, same naysayers in each post with their same complaints against it.

How does it ruin TBC overall?

I do like TBC I just think it could be better. A blend of TBC and wrath would be optimal.

Since you are a #nochanges classic TBC purist then the game must already be ruined for you then. Paladin seal changes? #somechanges. 58 boost? #somechanges. LW tinnitus nerf? #somechages. Druid shape shifting? #somechanges. Muru implementation? #somechanges

1 Like

I see you can’t understand cause and effect.
If changes are fine and don’t affect the game, try retail, it’s great!

1 Like

Again QoL changes don’t make it retail. The gameplay remains largely in tact.

Everyone who wants all the changes stuck in TBC is just gonna abandon the expansion anyway when wotlk is released. Lol.

Just wait for wrath, you impatient nerds.

1 Like

Dual spec, cross realm grouping, faction transfer, auto group and teleport to dungeon, race change, gender swap, personal loot, vote to kick, LFR, + difficulty content - just add it all. Because that would make it the best for everyone. And no one would be happy with it.

Your “one change” isn’t. Because someone else wants something else and on and on.

Just wait for wotlk.

1 Like

Nah, I’ll keep asking for Dual Spec until Blizzard says no.

1 Like

Or I can trust blizzard to know when to stop the changes.

Do the changes that keep gameplay in tact while not implementing the changes that do.

The changes so far haven’t ruined the game on a large scale. TBC still feels like TBC.

2 Likes

Yeeeeah, that isn’t a great track record. :wink:

1 Like

The changes so far are pretty good :smiley:

1 Like

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…

Trust blizzard, that’s how we got retail.

It took 15 years and dozens of changes to get to retail. You act like one change and it’ll be retail next month. It’s not gonna happen. So far blizzard has been careful and circumspect in the changes added to Classic and BC. Just remember when you pay your sub blizzard has added changes to both Classic and BC classic and they’re announced they are considering more.

1 Like

It’s also how we got classic by that logic.

The changes seem to be pretty good so far :smiley: