I don’t play console games, other than my daughters switch
Not sure if that counts as console
I enjoy the switch. I just wish it was a little more powerful and had more titles.
I’ve played a lot of Diablo on it.
I play Diablo on the pc
Switch I play pikman, animal crossing and mariokart although I haven’t played in awhile.
That would mean that you got this one wrong. Pointing at the year that you claim that Shadowlands would come out.
But, I got to say that you do a semi job at the trolling story and the one that you linked about Shadowlands, tho.
Hush. This is a great thread.
I admitted that the scheduling changed. Internal politics and logistics must be accounted for
I’m calling BS . Because you will keep eeging that person on then say they are harassing you .
You have no source because if you did this thread most likely would of been shut down due to the fact that your supposed contact that gave you the info has a NDA and you shared insider trade secrets.
Yah, no. And I don’t think you understand what you just said. I won’t be responding to you any further unless you have something constructive to say.
Oh I actually do . YOu keep saying you are going to ignore a person then you keep egging them on like a bona fide troll .
What do you consider constructive ? Agreeing with your troll topic ?
Not going to happen Sparky you’re not that good of a troll.
You know based off recent statements from Activision this console thing sounds like it might happen.
Warzone is the most transformative thing Activision has ever done. The free-to-play mode connects premium Call of Duty games with a cross-progression, cross-play, and a cross-SKU framework complete with in-game microtransactions. This model will carry over to all Activision-Blizzard franchises, especially big IPs like Diablo, Warcraft, and Overwatch.
That sure does lend extra credence to my sources information
The human eye can not notice a difference at a rate greater than 30fps. What you are referring to is a problem with digital animation in that no graphic card or network transmits a ‘pure image’ 30 times a second in motion.
Digital motion creates an effect called ‘screen tearing’. So in order for those kind of images to hide tearing, that range is much higher.
I’ve heard people say this before but it’s not true. You can definitely see a difference between 30 and 60 fps. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zquClG3j9so
THis coming from the person that acts like a console playing Fortnite kid.
So how many hours do you have to stand on the corner and spin the sign ?
The eye can see flickering at up to 60 fps, the issue with digital motion is that it isn’t 30 perfectly rendered frames a second, there’s ‘tearing’ of the image you don’t really notice it until you start trying to do ‘screen captures’ from an animated digital image because the rate is higher than 30, it gives the illusion of perfect motion but in fact hides the image distortion by going at rates greater than 60.
In old analog films or even older motion techniques, where each image is complete, sharp and in focus, most humans can not notice smoother motion above 30 frames a second.
Sorry, looks like you need to set the video to about 1080p or it wont play at 60fps. Watch that video at 1080 and you’ll notice the difference. It’s especially easy to notice when you look at the background when they’re turning.
How many generations of consoles do you think this has been said about in a row?
spooky if cross-play but RIO could help with that maybe