Master Blaster (about a paintball tourney that a guy brings a real gun to)
Ghost Rock (some kinda cowboy matrix crap)
Aliens 3
Mighty ducks series
the Mask 2
1 Like
Movies that don’t touch the success of that person if he is absent in it.
-
Men in Black International: More than a bad formula between the couple of tessa thompson and Chris Hemsworth, is that the Thor boy became the male version of the silly blonde like Marilyn Monroe.
-
Son of the Mask: When Jim Carey turns a movie to gold you’ll know that without it, it’s a piece of
. -
pacific rim Uprising and Hellboy 2019: When Guillermo del Toro says no, it’s no and there are the results.
-
Tom Holland Spiderman movies: Andrew Garfield and Toby Mcguire left a legacy, their last films were somewhat bad but they are seen and cult, what a millenian showed a new Peter Parker who forgot the death of uncle Ben and his parents and his new daddy Tony Stark gives him a new spider suit while all the beginning shows one more youtuber with the dream that he is finally a superhero without any problem.
It is a reason because the third installment forced that everything that was in the first franchise will always be better than a monkey brat, a lap dog Spider Dobby not only like Ironboy but also like Robert Downley Jr. Jr.
-
Independence Day of Resurgence: When you kill Will Smith because he does not want to participate, do not force to make a movie without him, no matter how much it is in the contract.
-
Last Trilogy Rei Star Wars: Do not kill the Skywalkers, do not make fun of what it cost him to become a Jedi, do not believe Marie Sue in a franchise that was left as a wasted legacy.
DON’T KILL TO HAN SOLO.
I think you are still missing the point. This thread is for the worst of the worst. Movies so bad that they either lost money, very few people admit to liking them, etc. What you are posting are successful movies with huge fanbases. In this way, they cannot be the worst movies ever.
I point you to another, “The Room.” This movie is so bad that the reviews on Amazon are openly mocking it. James Franco even made his own movie about it, “The Disaster Artist.” A “worst” movie will have bad quality cameras work, terrible dialogue, low-quality acting, intangible plot points, and probably more. Some of the movies you listed won awards. It can’t be listed in the “worst movie” category (for this thread, specifically), if it won awards.
If you still list successful movies, as I stated at the beginning of this post, you obviously have missed the point of the thread.
1 Like
Suburban Sasquatch, Ben and Arthur, and Samurai Cop are up there too
Oh, I also forgot. I don’t know the name of it, but there was an ad for an animated movie where the main character has to play soccer against their former bully / soccer pro, or they will bulldoze the town. The kid’s foosball characters come to life and cheat for him, so he can win… is what I gathered. I never saw it, but I imagine it is quite terrible. Anyone know the name of this movie, and if it was as bad as I think it is?
What kind of screwball logic is this? “Cigarettes can’t be bad for you because (roughly) 5 million people in the US smoke. They have a fan base.” Having a fan base and health have nothing to do with each other. Just like popular and quality has nothing to do with each other.
Are you seriously going to say that the Transformer movies are good just because they make a billion dollars each? It’s that amazing script that brought people in and not the fact they are low rated movies that entertain children all over the world?
I believe that would be a thing titled Metegol in Argentina where it was made, The Unbeatables in the United Kingdom, and Underdogs for the US release. I’ve never seen it, but Rotten Tomatoes scores it 67% with an audience score of 54%.
I’m saying they don’t meet the criteria for “Worst Movies Ever.” which is the point if the thread. They are passable, unlike movies with janky camerawork, dialogue that makes no sense, or plots that came from a Double Bubble wrapper.
Cigarettes are bad, but are they the worst for your health? Second-hand smoke gave me bronchitis twice in my childhood, but I’m not sure if the lifetime issues compare to, say, diabetes or high blood pressure.
But like I pointed out earlier: a lot of people don’t go dumpster diving for crappy B movies made in the 80s. Most people see movies in the theater or on TV. Are you saying the OP wants people to Google movies they never seen and list them?
You’re avoiding the point I’m making.
So, they could list the worst movie they’ve ever seen, but it really shows that some people don’t adventure out of their comfort zone, and then complain that the movie is bad. If the worst movie you’ve ever seen made a billion dollars, I think it says more about you than it does about the successful movie.
Also, the point you are making is equally “screwball” as you put it, since no one is saying cigarettes are good for you. It’s not an apples/apples comparison in this context, and you know it.
Oh really? So enlighten us to what it says about people that don’t go dumpster diving for crappy B movies. I would like to see this.
Yes, it’s a great comparison. Cigarette companies make billions of dollars a year. Millions of Americans smoke them. They are popular but that doesn’t make them good.
That is a perfect comparison to what we’re talking about.
I’m just saying that it’s perspective, and if the worst movie someone has ever seen made billions of dollars, especially those with positive reviews, or ones that have won awards, then maybe their viewpoint is skewed. It’s like someone only eating at 5-star restaurants. Their limited viewpoint will mean that their worst meal ever is not literally the worst meal of all time, so it wouldn’t fit the theme of a “Worst Meal of All Time” thread.
Cigarettes are still scientifically proven to be bad for your health. The comparison doesn’t work, because AFAIK, no one has died from watching movies, or from second-hand movie watching. Movies are just entertainment, and any comparison to cigarettes is disingenuous, and a bit forced. Again, in the context of this thread for the Worst Movies Ever.
I’ll let you reply again if you want, but you can have the last punch, as I don’t really want to derail the thread any longer than we have. I’ll just agree to disagree at this point. Have fun. Enjoy your time here. 
So if someone gets a burnt steak at a 5 star restaurant, they’re not allowed to complain or say it’s the worst steak they ever head because it’s a 5 star restaurant.
Once again, you’re avoiding the point.
You said a movie that made a billion dollars can’t be bad because it has a fan base. It’s popular, someone likes it, blah blah blah. I said cigarette companies make billions of dollars and are obviously very popular because millions of people smoke them. In both scenarios, just because something made a billion dollars doesn’t mean they’re good. Don’t try to change the subject by bringing in death.
Thanks for allowing that. I had no idea that you had that kind of power on these forums.
Well if you didn’t want to derail the thread, then you shouldn’t have attacked people for their choices. Also, this is my last “punch:”
This thread is becoming a firestorm 
Caddyshack II
Hmm … it may be, but I’m also giving reasons because sometimes a good movie can fail because of only its sequel that does not include an actor, actress, supporting actor or director, or even a screenwriter or writer depending on the movie as shown by these small details that would affect the detail no matter how successful it is or not.
like Atom Eve’s leotard in Invisible series with the comic one, although that would already be to point out to me as a pig to see the originality of a comic with the animated series, and that it has nothing to include something moralistic to one with R content or Mature.
And not even a difference since Snyder made almost 100% of the original comic when the Watchmen was released in 2009.
Are you really trying to compare a movie you personally don’t like to smoking cigarettes?? Speaking as someone whose father died of lung cancer caused from smoking I have to say that’s the most moronic and offensive statement I’ve ever heard. What the hell is wrong with you?
No I didn’t say that at all. I’ll ask you:
Trying reading instead of jerking your knee.
p.s. The fact that both of you are completely avoiding my comparison and trying to get some moral high ground by saying “OMERGAWD CIGARETTES KILL PEOPLE!!!” is hilarious. It just proves you have no real argument and you know I’m right.
I admit: it kind of annoyed me that these two are sticking their nose in the air and looking down on people because they don’t think the way the OP and Adomirak wants them to. Any opinion that doesn’t fit into Adomirak’s or Adrianv’s perfect box is wrong. They’ve made it pretty clear who the real
really are.
This reminded me:
A Christmas Story 2
And lets not forget pretty much everything from Ed Wood, like “Plan 9 From Outer Space”
The Cats movie adaptation. Even my kid who loves animals and singing and singing animals (e.g., My Little Pony) couldn’t get past the uncanniest of valleys. I keep trying to get to the TayTay cameo, but zounds. Just can’t do it 
The music is great, the dancing is beautiful, but that CG really and truly is a nightmare—no exaggeration. So far it’s a nice “audiobook” tho🤷🏻♀️
The manmeal scene alone was superb.