Ah okay! Not surprising. Jeff Kaplan - lead designer of TBC - came from EQ.
pretty sure they werent added until cataclysm.
Actually, all profession trainers are present in Outlands - but not necessarily in Shattrath. So, that too is a design decision.
It makes sense too as there was a new profession added and new profession levels and recipes. But that isnât really comparable to class respeccing and training.
And it should be noted this isnât actually respeccing, it would be more akin to switching professions in WoW.
Kinda irrelevant. Itâs still paying in-game currency to âre-doâ a thing you built or worked on, itâs all the same idea.
If you want something barely younger than that and more based on resetting permanent stat choices, thereâs the âReset Materialâ in Phantasy Star Online. In PSO your stats were permanently raised by using specific named items of particular stats, but you were limited to a total of 150 materials used, which meant you could balance your stats within those 150 materials. It was basically like adding stats when you level, except they were actual items you had to find as drops (the Power Material, Defense Material, etc).
Using a Reset Material would basically reset your material usage allowing you to rebalance your distribution, but of course you had to find all the materials again from scratch, 150 of the right ones for the build you wanted. Not uncommon to have a bank full of Evasion Materials when youâre trying to cap your Power.
The Reset Material could only be obtained by trading x5 Photon Drops to an NPC, which made it pretty expensive to do, and thatâs not even counting the fact you gotta find all 150 materials you want all over again which could take weeksâŚ(but not too bad for people who played regularly, kind of like respeccing here.).
PSO released in 2000.
Yes, the fake hardcore classic players are here. WE know you need time>skill, its why you guys fight so hard against these QoL changes most people want.
actually yes it is respeccing.
DS is by far one the most popular features real fans of TbC want.
ie based on interviews with 4 of my closest acquaintances, everyone wants dual spec.
Itâs been added back in a sort of token gesture. They do it by way of pathfinder, which is an obvious time-gate. Flight is made available after everyone has completed the content and is basically at the raid-log stage. Itâs one of the two reasons I dropped both my subs at the end of WoD and hadnât returned until classic.
Iâm thinking this is just another reason why they donât talk with the public like they used to. Far less likely to get caught lying if you simply donât say anything at all.
This is why every lawyer everywhere advises clients not to say anything, even if itâs the truth. Saying things is just a bad idea, generally.
the odds of them doing something about the respec situation
Not to put too fine a point on it, but there isnât a respec situation. The game, right now, is exactly as intended.
Kinda irrelevant. Itâs still paying in-game currency to âre-doâ a thing you built or worked on, itâs all the same idea.
Itâs actually more relevant that EQ didnât have talent trees, so respecialization isnât really analogous to respeccing. A better analogy in WoW would be if you could only have 1 weapon skill past 50 and if you wanted to switch you had to reset and then reup another one. And that would even be significantly more impactful than specializations in EQ.
This is why every lawyer everywhere advises clients not to say anything, even if itâs the truth. Saying things is just a bad idea, generally.
The communication expert a lawyer would approve.
Link. From Zelda
Yyyyaaaaahhhh!!! Hhhuuuuaaa. Aaaawweee.
No information given but sound is made, lol.
Ghostcrawler regretted adding dual spec lmfao
Lol, yup. Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it âŚ
Ghostcrawler regretted adding dual spec lmfao
Greg Street
@Ghostcrawler
2 May 2013
@tweetnasti
I do worry sometimes that dual spec solved a problem (talent points were a pain to rebuy) that no longer exists.
Greg Street
@Ghostcrawler
(https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler)2 May 2013
@tweetnasti
The intent of letting you remake choices was never supposed to be âI can swap to anything at a momentâs notice.â
(https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler)
Greg Street
@Ghostcrawler
(https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler)
2 May 2013
@tweetnasti
It was supposed to be âI made a decision that now I really regret and wish I could make over.â
Many profession trainers are also missing from Shattrath. Was that âdesignedâ for any particular purpose?
I do remember reading the reasoning behind this, in blue text, was to prevent the complete obsolescence of azeroth capital cities. Definitely not digging for it, but itâs out there, I assure you.
Maybe if dual spec cost 100,000g then OK I might see it.
He dismantles every argument he made about retaining âauthenticityâ and vies for an option that rewards and incentivizes gold-buying.
Fact of the matter is, as much as I was a fan of the original TBC, Classic TBC is simply different due to lower server populations. For the same reason same-faction BGs are a reality today to solve the lack of players of a certain type in battlegrounds, dual spec can solve the problem of the lack of much needed roles available for dungeons and raids.
the funny part is the same fanbois who claim, âiT dOeSnT bElOnG iN TBCâ are the same ones who are all fo HvH BGsâŚfunny how that wasnt in TBC but they cry for it