I am positive this is bait. Decent job too.
Its 100% bait. These forums would have exploded if someone had done that back then.
If anyone needed evidence of a troll, itâs this orc.
Look at my post above from Bahemoth. Let us know if you can find anything.
This isnât my original rogue from back in the day so donât use this guy as a source.
Youre making a strong argument that i should try this hardcore thing
/sigh. I put far too much effort into you but once and for all lets review your claims:
- rolled on a fresh 2005 post launch server
- played an orc rogue named shantino
- pugged and successfully killed ragnaros in 7 days.
So i go to warcraft realms (old census site) and type in shantino. Got a few hits. Some were orc rogues. I go to the list of post launch servers you provided and cross referenced the orc rogues to that list. 1 hit. Chromaggus which launched on November 30th. Click on the shantino from chromaggus and on December 17th he was level 40.
Let me guess. You deleted the shantino that did the 7 day rag kill so you could make a clone and do it again but take your time that go around, right? Piss off. It literally took me longer to write this post than it did for me to research your fraud.
I know a ton of people who have set and/or broken world records and just donât care to take credit for them. Happens all the time.
And Bahemoth was never heard from again. Well done
I also checked that census. It is around 1 month off of accuracy. Nice try tho.
I also checked people who were 60 b4 me and it shows them being 60 after me.
I know a ton of people who have set and/or broken world records and just donât care to take credit for them. Happens all the time.
Agreed. It happens everyday in many different games.
I also checked that census. It is around 1 month off of accuracy. Nice try tho.
Oh? You were level 40 a week and a half before server launched?
That was sarcasm, friend. Please, do continue.
All this aside, if you do try and attempt the 1 week Ragnaros defeat, best of luck to you. I have serious doubts itâs doable.
No, just saying that the census is inaccurate (Around 1 month) because I looked at others who were 60 before me and the census was showing that I hit 60 before them. I was already level 30 on the second day of the servers release.
That was sarcasm, friend. Please, do continue.
All this aside, if you do try and attempt the 1 week Ragnaros defeat, best of luck to you. I have serious doubts itâs doable.
The point is back then we werenât thinking like how people think now. To us Rag was already downed so we just rushed to get server firsts. We played because we loved the game. Not for titles and achievements.
No, just saying that the census is inaccurate (Around 1 month) because I looked at others who were 60 before me and the census was showing that I hit 60 before them. I was already level 30 on the second day of the servers release.
The way the census worked is that if someone with the addon is in the same zone as you it logged your level. Its not like it recorded the day you hit a particular level, but rather you were a certain level on that particular day. That said, if it says you were level 40 on December 17th, then you were level 40 on December 17th. Doesnt matter if you hit level 40 on December 2nd or December 16th, you were still level 40 on the 17th.
Donât try to fight it. There are literally books how censuses are inaccurate or how inaccuracies occur. Just a simple error like not adding the gathered info on the correct date or inputting bundled info on incorrect dates can throw the whole census off by days or even weeks. Not to mention how old the tech was⌠even censuses today carry inaccuracies when gathered on a large scale (100,000 plus).
Even at the bottom of the census page it says.
" ** Unguilded entries could be bogus due to problems with the World of Warcraft client not always 100% of the time getting guild information from Blizzardâs servers.*"
Go check for yourself. I wasnât even in Wrath until after I was lvl 60.
Lol keep lying dude. Even your bogus rebuttal clearly states it only applies to guild tags, not the levels. Give it up, youve got nothing other than screaming ânuh uh!â. You have no evidence to support your claim.
You clearly do not understand how it works and what that statement implies (Blizzard Client).
Some1 out there also had the server first strath clear but only they remember it. And since there is no evidence of that server first claim, then according to you that person is lying.
If you played back then and checked for your own records on that census you will clearly see all the inaccuracies bright as day.
You are correct, I do not care. GLHF.
My characters info on there is relatively accurate. Its not telling me i was level 40 when i was level 60 like youre claiming
The guild master (when I was in the guild) of Wrath is not even in the census. The more I look at this census the more inaccurate it is.
Yea, I wouldnât use this census to claim anything. Full of errors and missing data.
And all the toxic casuals were never heard from again!
Alpha Status!
And all the toxic casuals were never heard from again!
/snort. Thats because arguing with someone suffering from dementia is as productive as using a sledgehammer to cut down a tree