Got it you don’t have a valid point.
2 Likes
So because you can’t be bothered to read my reply to you means that my reply is invalid?
That’s some quality logic right there… GENIUS!
The prereq to critical thinking is thinking. Gotta start somewhere.
Oh wow 70+!?!?
Whats that in facebook likes!?!?! WOW 70+ LIKES ON THE WOW FORUMS!
I’ll help you out, complete this sentence.
Tourists are bad because
again, nice selective editing of one part of a larger reply.
Tourists are bad because:
[read above]
So exactly what critical thinking have you done Einstein? Because so far I’ve seen 3, 1 sentence replies, one of which is agreeing to a debunked premise.
Whats the conversion of wow likes to retweets? Just need something to gauge the value of that on.
Take some stats classes and learn how data should be collected and proccessed. Then come back.
And Cauchy came before Einstein.
Got it you have no reason.
The best teachers lead by example, so why don’t you demonstrate how
with a relevant example to the topic at hand.
The point being, you are neither. Just because you called your wow character that doesn’t make you Cauchy. I wasn’t even considering your name when mocking your position.
Got it, you are illiterate (or blind)
[Read above] is not a reason.
Correct, ‘read above’ is a direction that leads you to the reason.
Im still looking for the segment on tourists
ctrl+f brings up nothing
Why does it need to be it’s own section in order for it be a point I made? Have you never heard of inference and/or nuance?
Maybe you should amend the post and add it
Ill bet you could get to 80 upvotes aka 33 facebook likes with that chapter to your book
[read above] is not a reason.
So if you’re talking about following simple direction you failed miserably.
Well I didn’t feel the need to initially because I assumed a higher level of intellect from my readers. However, you have high lighted to me the reality that there are those who are not of a sufficient reading ability to understand inference and/or nuance. Therefore, I hereby promise that at some point in the near future when I feel the sufficient amount of motivation, I will not only clarify which parts of my OP’s arguments are referring to tourists by putting it under it’s own sub section but I will also elaborate on the original points made with ideas that I have had written down for public viewing for about a month by this point.
I know it’s not a reason, I just told you it’s not a reason, it’s a direction. If the reply elaborating on why tourists are to some degree bad for the game is above the direction, then the direction is correct. However, I may agree that you could be scrolling through a few replies before you find it but the direction is nonetheless correct.
Thank you. Im rooting for this to get to 80 upvotes. We need more young fiction authors on these forums
God speed on your boost in TBC
If you have a valid reason you should be able to state it clearly and concisely, all you have to do is do so.
The point of mentioning the likes amongst the, far more substantial may I add, support for OTHER PEOPLES anti-boosting public content was to point out that there is support for our view there and that the support is in juxtaposition to the folks on your side who default to trolling our threads with replies that get 5-7 likes at most. It suffices as evidence to suggest that your group is less popular than ours.
I won’t because I refuse to repeat myself for your pleasure. You’re trying a common trick in debate where the individual attempts to create unnecessary and unreasonable demands of their opposition not only to stagger and distract from the conversation at hand but also so that when their opposition reasonably and justifiably refuses to adhere to the demands, the individual in question can then make the disingenuous claim the person doesn’t simply not WANT to adhere to the demand, but that they are incapable of doing so. They do this in a cheap attempt to discredit and humiliate their opposition.
I refuse to fall for it.