But gating is the reason why people can pug +20’s, yet LFR, which has absolutely no gating beyond meeting the minimum ilvl, regularly wipes a dozen times on N’zoth.
Gating is the cornerstone of successful pugs in WoW. Taking the first people to apply always has, and always will be, an awful way to build a group.
1.) It is one of the two barriers (along with ilvl) to doing higher level keys, so people blame it for their inability to progress in m+.
2.) Rarely, but still some of the time, people apply high standards to joke keys (Anyone who even looks at io for +2 is insane), so it gets a bad rep for being overly punitive.
Again, just because it’s difficult for you to imagine playing the game without addons doesn’t mean poeple aren’t.
Until there’s a survey done provin’ that a majority of players use addons, I’m considering it a rather safe bet to say most casual players don’t, and casual players make up a very massive majority of the players in wow. Though at the rate this conversations going, next your gonna try to argue that casuals are a minority.
And the RP addon thing was an example. Not a rule.
I’m really not understandin’ why you’re getting so upset over this.
I think it gives enough to take a shot on someone. You get the top of whatever dungeon and you can see the party and probably weed out a lot of the people who bought carries for that top one.
Not as convenient, but definitely workable if one was inclined to screen a little for a group but didn’t want to use IO
If I tell you “I don’t like peanut butter” and you reply with “so you’re saying I shouldn’t throw jars of peanut butter through business windows?”. You may be right, that you shouldn’t do that but that does not mean its not a strawman.
Sad thing is, no one here has actually shown any entitlement, as far as I can see.
I certainly haven’t. I’ve stated my reasons for not liking IO, but at no point have I made the claim that I ‘deserve’ to be invited to high end content on a whim. Pretty sure Arthas hasn’t said that either (although admittedly, I’ve missed some of his posts so I might be wrong).
So he’s claiming that there’s entitlement when there isn’t in order to throw folks who disagree with him under a bus.
The content is gated by design. It’s not meant for everyone. What is even your point here?
Follow the thought to the end. Content where experience is the highest correlation to success, addon to easily display readily available experience… you can do it.
What? There’s no straw man here. False Entitlement is the only argument against RIO.
It’s only gated behind key numbers by design. Adding to that with incompetent players who have no idea how metrics work… by giving them a metric is bad bad bad.
I could possibly reply to this with what you quoted to being with… for real.
lmao! It’s the very epitome of a strawman. You’re attacking positions you’re inventing.
all rio does is show experience and show whether or not you are qualified. People against it want to usually get into runs they arent qualified for and then say pugs have unrealistic standards