Can’t prove selective enforcement (wont even acknowledge you’ve failed to meet the very definition of it, maybe google it like you had to do with terms of service haha), couldnt prove it wasnt a legal document so you gave up and suggested legal p’s and q’s aren’t at the point of the discussion of what addon makers can or can’t do, cant prove the guides are part of the addon cause you’re still saying “trust me bro they are” after admitting to the legal nature of the definiton of an addon separating the guides from the addon (you call it a “loophole”)… got it. See ya.
Maybe i am just buzzwording but at least i don’t need to check the defintions of them. Good luck proving its against the tou and addon policy.
Why are people miffed by this anyway you can get it for free you can legit put speed runs on a 2nd monitor its an old game who cares if 90% of players level with the same path with a magic arrow lol.
Starts new character darn i cant figure out how to kill these same plain striders again good thing rested xp let me know they haven’t moved their spawn since 2007 XD.
The games so old even the new players will get taught everything by the old if they stick about in a flash its a solved game who cares if everyone level the same way lol.
Need some proper drama to fill the void these kinds of things feel like grasping for some when there is none to be had lol
I will bump this post until kingdom come until you answer.
Did your opinion of rxp get it banned? Rofl. Good luck, kid. Welcome to the legal world. Trust me i’ll never forget your admission of a “loophole” proves me right thru and thru.
Come back when it gets banned. I’ll wait. Or keep bumping.
Dude you literally thought a ToS wasn’t a legal document. Not sure how many will read this but man that’s all they need to hear.
Does the water heater have a large capacity? I know I’m not paying rent to live in your head, but I do enjoy hot showers and feel it is a reasonable request.
Still no understanding of selective enforcement? Got it. Googled it yet?
How embarrassing was it to finally google terms of service? (we both know you did after i called you out) Or is it still not a legal document to you? Please tell me more of your reality. I’m interested.
Otherwise - by your own standard - the rested xp can simply change their name of the site that sells such guides - and it no longer violates the rules per the standards you just defended
I guess the water heater is nothing special, but I love the smooth floors.
That would be silly. Good thing that isn’t my own standard or the policy I just defended.
The policy states that the developer cannot monetize anything related to their addon. Doesn’t matter what the name is. It would need to be a 3rd party entity entirely. I simply used the names being the same as further evidence that the addon isn’t some generic guide addon but rather it’s specifically for the paid guides where the options to “create your own guides” are an attempt at a loophole.
Blizz has sole discretion at what addons they can ban from accessing their game files so it’s really not a complicated issue.
It literally does not say this. You keep making this part up. It never says “anything related to the addon”. You just want to interpret it that way. What’s worse is you attempt to interpret that legal document without having the presence of mind to recognize it as a legal document. Lets not forget that you didn’t even understand the addon policy was an excerpt of a legal document. Nevermind that you’ve since been proven wrong, that it is a legal document. You’re still beating the same drum. Your entire argument is based on lies. The first is a lie you tell yourself, that you’re prepared to understand the policy, the second is lying about the policy itself.
Blizz does have sole control over addon bans. It isn’t banned. So you must totally be right even though you make up statements the ToU doesn’t make, that blizzard never actioned, because they don’t exist, but thats confirmation for you?
What type of floors did you install when rxp launched in your head for free as a non-banned app?
Have you googled selective enforcement yet? How embarrassing that must have been, rofl.
What? Pirates? You chose pirates for that example? Were you going for something insulting or funny? Like swashbuckling pirates, irl open sea oil tanker pirates, or like hacker software pirates? No matter which one i can’t imagine any situation ever where that comment would have the effect you want. Bwahaha.
Rxp banned yet? Or are you still crying selective enforcement?
For selective enforcent to have occurred both actions must have been taken. So surely you must have the example your friend never produced. You know, proof they actioned an addon for monetizing the same way as rxp. You know, proof that blizzard used the same addon policy to determine two different actions against the same violation. I’d accept almost anything in the addon space that meets the definition. Oh, i see whats happened here, you’re like your buddy above and don’t even know the definition of the words you’re using.
Take a moment to google the definition of the term you’ve been using, then come back here and show me the bias blizzard has displayed in relationship to another monetized addon.
If they have never taken action against an addon with this model, then they have never selected anything, lol. A legally reasoned lack of action is not selective enforcement. Banning one with bias while leaving another alone is the only way to meet the definition of selective enforcment. So are you prepared to meet the definition? Cause your buddy just ignored this when he couldn’t use it to support himself anymore.
For my benefit, how about you explain that to me. How could software pirates enter into this discussion? Nothing is being stolen from anyone? Wild. Lol, was it just supposed to be a good vs evil comparison? Are software pirates your anti-hero? Was i supposed to just realize you find them to be villainous enough to make that a commonplace comparison of good vs evil? Makes total sense, lol.
I get that you are going to die on the guides are addon hill. But when you try to use words incorrectly, literally try to redifine them like amo and you have done multiple times in this post, you lose your grip on a rational argument. And its freaking hilarious watching you two keep it going.
Thats a lot of words to say you’re way too proud of yourself over being wrong.
People have explained this to you, but you just want to be right so badly you ignore the literal blue posts and babble on about tinfoil hat buffoonery. This joke has about run its course.
Looked it up and realized you didn’t understand it or have any proof from the start, didn’t you? Got it. You can’t even meet the definition of the trigger words you’re using, but I’m wrong. I’ll wait on you to prove selective enforcement in the addon space. It would be so easy for you if it were true. Like so easy that it begs the question why you can’t. If I’m so wrong, why can’t you? I won’t just trust you when you could prove it with a single name. So just say it, lol.
Those blue posts are summaries of blizzard’s legal standpoint on addons. Both the summary and the original document specifically fail to define the guides made by an addon for creating guides as part of the addon. Auras are not part of the addon for making auras, and can be sold. Literally no difference. But I’m so wrong, lol. Amo tried the same thing, so maybe you’ll stop saying the blue posts don’t reference a legal document if you go google the definition of ToU/ToS. Kinda feels like a trend with the anti-rxp to blatantly claim falsehoods as facts. Hilarious.
So zero explanation about your pirates? Bwahaha. Thought so. Totally sick burn tho, promise.