Winning, or having fun?
Do y’all care about winning more, or do y’all care about having fun, challenging games more.
In other words, if you had the power to GUARANTEE a win EVERY single game, but it had the side effect of making battlegrounds “easy,” and kinda boring after a while, would y’all do it?
Personally, I would not.
After all, and this is a real quote I think,
“if you beat someone that you know you’re going to beat, that’s bullying. There has to be a mysterious element as to whether or not you’re going to win the game. Then it’s actually competitive.” -Chael Sonnen, I think (referenced by GothamChess).
But yeah, the reason I ask is because I’ve noticed there’s a lot of egos in the battleground community. A lot of people seem to be getting more and more obsessed with the optics of beating people, as opposed to having nice, fun, challenging games.
And yes, even I used to be very competitive in that regard, but I feel like I’ve gradually moved away from that mindset. I like competitive games. Easy wins are very boring, and if I feel like my strategies/tactics are too powerful, so much so that enemy teams, even premades, will have NO chance of countering them, I straight up just won’t do them lol (like sure I may do them ONCE “for the luls,” like SAS leaders can attest to lol, but I know that doing it over and over will just lead to boring games that are impossible for the enemy to counter).
Blizzard has not added an epic BG in several years, so if winning becomes too easy, epics will become stale and boring. And that is why I personally state (as I joke) that I “only use 1% of my power.”
But anyway, I’m really curious as to what the rest of y’all feel like. Do y’all care the most about having “fun, challenging” games, or does the thrill of winning, and the “owning of your enemies” that comes with it, even if it makes the games worse in the long run, trump all else?