None of the examples of clear Alliance bias in circumstance to circumstance countered by you, bitter one. You post on a worgen. At least admit that if they gave Maw mounts to goblins but not worgen that’d be one more instance of Horde favouritism in your book but the way things are right now is just right and proper, working as intended.
I’m replying to the person I quoted, but the system took it as an answer to your post for some reason
Gotcha I was confused for a moment there.
Oh yeah, I remember you tossing random words last time I bothered having an exchange with you. Also remember the poor attempt at trying to pin the victim complex to the faction that is not constantly calling bias over every single thing.
Seems like you have a hard time when people call your faction out for…what was it you said? “Victim complex”.
Yeah this is a story. Leaders die. Too bad so sad they’re on your faction. Quit whining and get over it.
See how unfair that statement feels?
User was talking about time a faction campaigned for a race, and I answered with a similar example. Alliance high elf fans have been campaigning since vanilla and the same with the horde requesting for ogres since vanilla as well.
Ruining the foundation of the game…
Or…
Getting over the victim complex.
Clearly, the first it’s easier.
The faction system is not the foundation of the game. It was 10 years ago, but now the foundation of the game is Raiding, M+, and PvP.
PvP is not faction based, at least not for the content that rewards meaningful loot. RBGs are not faction based. Arenas are not faction based. That leaves generic open queue BGs and Open world. Both of these can remain with warmode.
So you can remove the faction system, allow players of all races to group and guild together, and then have warmode for those who want to engage in openworld pvp or normal bgs.
Literally nothing is removed, only we’d be allowed to mingle with the opposite faction.
It’s not like there’s even a chat or much of an economic barrier: People have bnet friends on other factions and for any significantly important gold item players will freely swap using their bnet balance to grab it, such as for world first raiding.
So yeah… there is literally nothing that will be lost by removing the faction system.
to the faction that is not constantly calling bias over every single thing.
This is honestly rather hypocritical of you considering the stuff you’ve been posting in this thread.
However, there is one side that is made to look better every time
I quickly learned that, as a Horde player, “Following the road” it’s not always safe, since there’s this fascination of putting Alliance hubs right on those.
The gap becomes more evident when you start taking specs into account, but don’t say it too loudly or they might lynch you for not being a “true Alliance player”.
If you actually took a look at it, then you wouldn’t be here trying to convince others that Alliance has it so bad.
You really seem to have a bit of this victim complex you accuse others of having.
I could careless who they gave mounts to as everyone can eventually get them. Worgen only benefit is getting the movement speed of being mounted i still get kicked put of the maw at eye of the jailer 5 just like everyone else. Your fishing hard for something that your not going to find from me. I am quite carefree when it comes to horde vs Alliance I just accept the fact there is a number of bonuses the horde that don’t exist for the Alliance.
They should have given Alliance the Krokul Broken as an allied race instead of lightforged.
Literally 100% agree, I was act thinking at the time we would since they got the model upgrade and all… would of also made more sense then Void Elves that’s for sure…
Void Elves should of never happened in my opinion and Alliance should of or eventually gotten High Elves which is still on if the most requested races in all forums.
I am quite carefree when it comes to horde vs Alliance
Yeah, it really shows from your posts.
I just accept the fact there is a number of bonuses the horde that don’t exist for the Alliance.
And vice-versa, just like you and other worgen can mount in the maw for one obvious. But somehow that’s not a problem … because all you can see is your preconceived notions. Everything that goes against it is discarded and everything that reinforces it is dwelt on. Tell me you’d be carefree if goblins could mount and worgen could not, instead of seeing it as one more sign of the completely fictional Horde bias.
I get it you can’t understand that your so blind to the facts that you have to fish for a reason to have someone else share your hate of others. Pity. Well I’m sorry you feel that way. I’ve been a Worgen on any class that can be a Worgen since the start of Cataclysm, for 10 years I had to deal with one of the worst released models in WoWs history. The stupid perma snarl rabid looking semi pregnant chihuahua a model that no one liked or wanted. Yet I stuck with the race I choose to play and ironicly for the first time in 10 years ended up getting a bonus after all this time of neglect and being completely ignored by Blizzard when it came to the core races being reworked. Worgen were the only core race in the game to not get a single change to our racials. But like I said inspite of all that and all the other points that have been pointed out there are some horde only fan boys like yourself who refuse to see the truth when it’s laid out in front of you. I understand this and don’t bother trying to argue with people like you as is easier and more productive to argue with a stone. You just keep living in your fantasy world where you think the calls of horde bias are unfounded and the rest of us will be here in reality.
You can rant all you want about how you are the OG worgen and who cares but it’s clear to everyone that you are so bitter about Horde bias but deflect when it comes to clear Alliance advantage re an Alliance race being allowed to mount in the maw.
At least have the courage to say that yes, if the tables were turned and all goblins could mount but worgen couldn’t then you’d see that as Horde bias.
Why is it that any time a group has a disadvantage, they’re given advantages to try and incentivize them, the group with the overall advantage cries about it?
All these posts and you still haven’t proven Horde biased. My beard remains undef…undef… standing…hic! when compared their beards…hic!
You really seem to have a bit of this victim complex you accuse others of having.
I think you’re mistaking pointing out blatant things anyone can see for placing the back of my hand over my forehead and claim that woe is me.
I adapt to those inconveniencies or bring them up when people claims the grass is greener on Horde side. I don’t claim Blizz hates the Horde over it.
That’s you guys’ thing.
That’s you guys’ thing.
Good to see you continuing to do this in other threads, despite the fact players of both factions are guilty of the same things.
Sadly, the only way to fix it is to give the Alliance the advantages they gave Horde over the years which swung players towards the Horde.
They let it go on for too long and it created a snowball effect. While I’d say the overall balance is better between the two factions, the damage is irreparably done and only imbalance it in the favor of the Alliance will, temporarily, solve the issue.
Good to see you continuing to do this in other threads.
And as a follow up I’ll say:
Get a sense of humor, even if it’s a cynical one like mine. It helps with coping.