So the warfronts, which were billed to be areas which the Alliance and Horde repeatedly fought over, were only fought over once each?
https://i.imgur.com/f29B3P3.jpg
Indeed for the Darkshore Warfront. Just like raids and mythic+ dungeons are billed to be run over and over, but in lore only done once.
Headcanon would be coming up with a fanfiction script for the Hordeâs second turn that is not shown in canon in-game or otherwise at the Darkshore Warfront after the Allianceâs turn.
Danuser even explained this in your favorite interview, saying that they wanted the Darkshore Warfront to still be engaging so they didnât want to release the wrap up so cleanly, likely because Horde players might get discouraged running something for so long that they already knew from the beginning they had been slated to lose.
1 Like
No, no, no. Your intellectual dishonesty doesnât fly here. The raids are never stated to be a recurring story implement. That was the whole theme of the warfronts. The factions would fight over them, build forces to take them, and then the other faction would do the same.
No, he didnât. Donât worry though, Amadis. Despite your usual willingness to copy paste things (though I know why you didnât this time. 
) Iâll take up your slack here.
Night Elf fans were also unhappy in the Alliance, as it seemed like their revenge for the Burning of Teldrassil was condensed into a single quest chain that ended in a stalemate and a Warfront.
âFans of the Night Elves have great points they brought up about some of those things, and the intention was to never make Tyrandeâs choices feel weak or marginalized in any way,â says Danuser. âBut by the same token, we needed the Warfront to be fictionally something that would be engaged in for a long time. We couldnât resolve things as clean there, but the intent was always to have her story carry forward. This isnât just a small visual change thatâs happened to her. Itâs something fundamental to her character, and weâll explore that much more deeply in Shadowlands.â
He did not say or imply in any way, shape, or form that they were One And Done. He stated that the intent was always to have her story carry forward, which⊠is to the surprise of literally no one. No one thought the Horde would keep Darkshore. Not even Spuddyâs orc horde purist friend whose name escapes me.
1 Like
And it was not delivered upon for the Darkshore Warfront, which did not even have rotating leaders.
Actually, I donât recall them every saying it was a recurring story implement, either. Want to pick up the slack on that citation as well?
Yep, thatâs what I was referring to.
1 Like
You literally quoted it.
1 Like
So that would mean that the Horde still occupied Darkshore and Ashenvale, proving even more that they are no better than Sylvanas.
You are being absurd here Treng, use some logic.
If the warfront was still being a thing in 8.3, then Shandris, one of the elven commander, was fighting in the same time at Darkshore, Dazarâalor, Nazjatar and then Orgrimmar.
Same for Genn and Tess, you are saying they were doing things in stormwind (worgen heritage) at the same time they were fighting for DarkshoreâŠ
I know you dont want to accept it but just do it. The Kaldorei alone defeated the Horde in Darkshore during 8.1, just as their civilians almost defeated the entire Horde Army in War of Thorns.
6 Likes
Youâre being absurd, compadre. The Horde and Alliance are fully capable of fighting with or without specific commanders.
Genn, Tess and Shandris are in the epilogue when at least the gilneans should be in stormwind during 8.3. As i said, this is just absurd.
With this âlogicâ you will be saying that the new intro leveling zone (1-10) of shadowlands happens after bfa just because of the gameplay implementation date.
4 Likes
What do you mean? Last time I checked that area was as active as ever.
Treng still trying? Kinda of sad if it makes you feel better the farmers
Wherent called up till after the battle of dazalore probably anyways
2 Likes
Notice the lack of the phrase ârecurring story implementâ in that quote? I did. Additionally, if your claim was that the Warfronts were billed to be one way or another you should be quoting something from the beginning of the expansionâs life, not an interview at its end.
And when did you see that at the Darkshore Warfront? In your headcanon?
1 Like
No. Blizzard gave up on Warfronts super early on in the expansion because they werenât even as close to as popular as theyâd expected them to be. They announced two other warfronts that they didnât add on. Likewise they just didnât add more boss rotations like they did for Arathi.
This isnât rocket science, alliance fans.
So none of this:
Ever happened. Not even in your own headcanon.
He admitted it in the interview you quoted. Literally spelled it out for you. If youâre incapable of reading (proof against your arguments), I literally cannot (and will not) help you.
You already quoted the interview up above, so people can see that he does not say the Horde came back without Nathanos or Sira.
People (usually? I guess maybe one does 
)donât need their hand held to understand that people that a war isnât the exact same scene repeated for over a year.
So youâre back to headcanon then.
So your only argument is the time the cinematic was implemented.
This.
1 Like