Huh? You decided to ridicule the part that you “know” is irrelevant to the entire discussion?
Idk man. One is illegal, carries prison time, and financially damages one of the parties. The other one is within the law, within blizzard policies, but disliked by the local vocals.
Enjoyment is just about the only thing similar here. Your argument is, at the very most, false equivalence on its best day.
“Man, I enjoy eating this orange. Reminds me of the time I ate watermelon, I felt the same way.”
“UH BRO? That’s not even REMOTELY comparable! Watermelons are a different food! And they have seeds! Oranges have NO seeds! And watermelons are pink! How could you even possibly compare the two?? It’s totally different!”
As always, focusing on the specifics and missing the overall concept.
Shriveled brainlet argument like most of the people riding this comparison.
WHOA man! We’re all different people. How can you compare us like that? I’m posting on this character and they’re posting on a totally different character. We ate different things for breakfast this morning! It’s two TOTALLY DIFFERENT people! Wow you’re CLUELESS!
Why are you still bringing the degree of the act into this? It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument at all. The argument is that the nature of the two acts are similar. No one is saying they are anything similar in severity. Just that the concept of both are similar. Both acts are disparaging an opposing party for their own gain. While having no regard for said party, even when knowing the act is looked down apon by the greater community. That’s it, very simple.
Simple is hard around here, apparently.
But what if my friends want to play cupid/splay?
I personally have no problem with someone playing whatever they want to play. I’m here to call him out on his bad faith argument tactics. Which he employs whenever he posts on the forums.
That’s cool and all but like so does everyone else and aug abusers, tank queuers, and the rest of the people playing stuff like that make the game objectively worse for everyone else trying to have fun.
Aight. I guess aug players may as well commit genocide then. Comparable acts and such.
I think I’ve queued into one tank in the past 500 arena matches because they’re all almost unplayably bad.
Aug on the other hand is pretty good.
There you go again, avoiding the subject. haha
Fascinating take. I’m sure this opinion was enjoyable for you in the same way others enjoy playing aug or stealing credit cards.
Are you capable of providing anything to a conversation? Why do you avoid everything?
I provided a reasoning on how the two are comparable but your reply was pretty much.
“haha, one is bad so they both as bad as this derr” . Grow up please.
And I provided reasons that your comparison was false equivalency.
I explained why it isn’t and you avoided it.
Severity (also known as Quality of the Act) is, quite literally, one of the criteria under Nature of the Act. Lol. I’m done y’all are something else.
The nature of an act are the qualities of the act. Sure severity is one of them, but in this analogy it clearly does not matter. The similarities being drawn are the acts of
Which as you can see I already mentioned and you as usual ignored and avoided.
Under your understanding, analogies just do not exist. Since if the scale of one thing is not directly identical to another it doesn’t work.
The scale does not have to be identical to draw a comparison between two things. Unless the specific item you are comparing in the analogy is scale. Which is not the case here.
Just like the comp that’s in discussion