The “logical reason” is that blizzard cant balance things. This is nothing new and not a reason to kill other players fun and the games expansion because of balance reasons. By that logic we would never have gotten any new classes, no new races or racials, no covenants, no artifact weapons, no essences etc. If they listen to this “logical reason” then we would never get anything new and the player base would fall off even more. So I reject this “logical reason” because its not logical.
Also funny that you are calling me selfish when you clearly only care about the classes you play being strong. You are the embodiment of selfishness
Me me me me me.
Yes I would love new classes. Esp since it would make you upset.
So it’s okay to have unplayable classes, ones that don’t get any work put into them and then are completely broken, ruining other players’ fun.
Mkay.
Can’t have a discussion or back up his own argument, so decides to throw insults.
Bye now. 
No new classes! 4th specs (where it makes sense)
1 Like
Now this is something I like. First up Shaman Tank please!
1 Like
I’ll bite one last time before I put you on ignore:
I absolutely never once said I wanted some class to be overpowered. In fact, I said I didn’t want classes to be left behind and unfinished, which is not overpowered. So you can stop twisting things into lies.
And you’re the one who flipped out, refused to have a discussion and went straight to insults, while I continued to calmly explain the issues with adding on more classes. I’m not the one getting childish here.
Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t automatically mean they’re a child.
And you didn’t ask for explanations, which I would have gladly provided had you actually continued a conversation. But instead, you threw a fit and tossed insults, acting immature and uninterested in anything but an echo chamber.
Now you go on ignore.
They haven’t fixed and balanced all the current classes and specs though…
Yea you proved nothing. Its always the hunters. You spoke of classes being broken and unplayable like they were facts. These are not facts and if you say something is then it should include some evidence. If you refuse to give it because you do not want to then that is on you. Dont expect people to accept that the game is broken just because you say so. The mere expectation of that statement is what lead to your comments being disregarded. Have some more respect for other peoples time should you wish to be heard by putting your thoughts in more detail before expecting others to just accept it.
IMO They need to un-butcher the classes we have now and undo the damage they’ve done to them over the years. (then maybe look at a new classes while also not having to destroy current ones to make them)
Its going to be a good time when we get that new class or 4th specs for other existing classes. No way wow can continue to survive without introducing new classes
Instead of a new class, I’d like to see some new specs added to existing classes. Necromancer could easily be a new ranged DPS spec for death knights.
I’d love to see almost every class get a tank spec. I can’t think of any class that doesn’t have some gimmick they could use for tanking, from bubbles to shields (magic and physical) to dodge/parry mechanics. Adding a tank spec to Shaman is a no brainer, they should have had one years ago, but even Mage could have a magic-based tank spec.
I’d also love to see more classes get healing specs. Might not make sense for a warrior, but a rogue could have an alchemist spec where they throw healing pots at people that apply HoTs or others that do a chunk of healing, or ones that cure poison, etc. Then have a bit of ranged DPS by throwing poisons at enemies that apply DoTs. Warlocks could have a fricken awesome one where they steel life from the enemies around them and give it to their party.
As fun as new classes are, adding more options to existing classes might also help with tank/healer shortages.
How would a necromancer differ from a mage or warlock (or some combination of the two)?
Amazingly, going to gogle dot com actually takes you to google! 
1 Like
Why does a bard have to be a support class? Just because it’s a support class in other games? It would be whatever the devs made it. Honestly, I can’t stand the idea of a bard regardless of its role.
A bard could have a support spec and dps spec imo
Where did she say those were facts? Sounds like she was just giving her opinion, just like everyone else here. Calm down man.
Before we get a new class we need:
-diablo style ilvl upgrade for all items. Shouldn’t have to farm multiple iterations of BIS
-universal transmog for all classes and types. If I get warglaives on my mage my alts should be able to transmog them.
-keystones for all old content to be able to run it solo or in a group at an appropriate level of challenge.
-useful professions.
-ability to use BOP items as BOA items.
You misunderstand - the support role is my choice wherever it is offered. It was offered in WoW, and that’s why I’m a Shaman. However, that role has since been eliminated. It has left Shamans - Enhancement, in particular - in a very awkward position, with no true niche or clear vision of what the class is anymore, because that original purpose was removed.
As such, as someone who loves the support role, and given that Bard is essentially the apotheosis of the support role, I do not want to see it mocked with a muddled WoW implementation.
Let’s let the devs focus on balance first and foremost. The last new class they added, especially in this environments of temporary power, ended up heavily gimped and felt horrific to play because they were so tightly woven into one borrowed power that a new borrowed power didn’t fill the gaping voids left open.
First thing’s first: let’s see if Blizzard can give up on this ridiculous idea of expansion specific power and fix the classes and specs so they can play without borrowing abilities and then we can consider a new class or spec or something.
When she said classes are broken and unplayable that was a statement of fact. Additionally this was the basis for denying any new classes or specs in the game so its clear that the player believed it to be a fact as nothing was said to indicate it was not a statement of fact. Why else would you deny a new class for a reason someone does not believe to be true and factual?