We did it! 2h frost!

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

Already answered it.

[Taelgaro-stormrage]

Link it then.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

No, it’s not. It’s not my problem that you can’t remember what you have said to me for me to even ask you where your argument came from.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

I answered it to you, go read my responses to you.

[Taelgaro-stormrage]

You didn’t all you said was nerfing DW was better because it involved “less work” was “much simpler” and “gave people what they want”. How does it do so?

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

Not remembering what you asked me in here with threads merging together eh?

[Taelgaro-stormrage]

That’s not answering the question. How does nerfing DW do the things above?

[Nicolas-sargeras]

I guess the argument has become that i am too much of a fool to follow along. Got it. You win.

I cant debate if you wont engage. If you dont want to debate, Thats fine too.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

You said that Blizzard did not agree with me, I asked on what and you said seeing the value of bringing 2h back, I then asked where this argument even came from.

This was not a hard thing to follow.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

I’ve already answered that, I am not going to repeat myself.

[Nicolas-sargeras]

I literally answered you twice

[Nicolas-sargeras]

@Nicolas-sargeras

@Nicolas-sargeras

If youre actually asking why Bliz sees value in adding 2h Frost back in the game… Well… Because they just added 2h Frost back into the game.

Again… is this the “argument” you are referring to. I said i am supporting my inference that Bliz sees value in 2h Frost by the fact that Bliz took the time to add it back into the game.

Is that a strong enough basis for you good sir and/or ma’am

See the second time i answered it above.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

Where did that argument come from? Because I didn’t make any argument you suggested I did with you bringing up what you did.

[Nicolas-sargeras]

@Kelliste-antonidas

Doesn’t agree with me on what?

I said that fortunatly Bliz sees value in adding 2h frost back, then you asked why i felt that way. I explained why I felt that way. That was then followed by mutiple posts of you saying that i cant follow along.

My head is still spinning from that. Yikes.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

I did not ask you why you felt that way. I asked you what Blizzard disagreed with me on and where that argument came from in the first place.

[Setralinee-moon-guard]

Excuse me being a noob to DK but is unholy spec duel weild? Would be cool to have that difference between playing with 2hers and 1hers on the other dps spec imo

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

It’s not, 2h only. There have been bugs and interactions that weren’t intended that happened in the past however where DW unholy was good.

[Anakoni-wyrmrest-accord]

@Kelliste-antonidas

I don’t really care what you would like, I’ll call them 2h supporters.

Ok, but…

@Kelliste-antonidas

so what do you want to call them?

Maybe don’t ask questions that you don’t want answers to, but I guess that would get rid of half your posts.

[Vedist-uldum]

It is not. But some unholy players want dw unholy.

[Kelliste-antonidas (Kelliste)]

You didn’t say what to call them in the first place. And it wasn’t a serious question in the first place. Do you see a bunch of DW supporters going around doing this stuff or is everyone else just a frost supporter and wants what is best for the spec while 2h supporters just talk about 2h.

Hell we can’t even get into issues of the spec because 2h is such a big balance point at the moment and so much time is being invested in that. So many talents just flat out suck that it’s just crazy people rather complain about a cosmetic than try to fix things like inexorable assault, avalanche, icy talons just to name a few.

If this keeps up it’s going to be the same spec all over again. So yes, they are 2h supporters.